This is rude...

Sort:
Avatar of trysts

I thought a DARPA was a fish?

Avatar of letsgohome
blueemu wrote:

Check yous sentence again. It's not a complete sentence. It's a subjective clause.

For comparison, here is a sentence:

The irony of disparaging one when conversely you are denigrating yourself is appalling.

Secondly, the appalling part you added is redundant, for that is why I purposely left it out to create emphasis on what is heavily implied. Can you not read between the lines, brah.  

Avatar of letsgohome
trysts wrote:

I thought a DARPA was a fish?

It's an acronym for Defense Advanced  Research Project Agency, I believe.

Avatar of blueemu
letsgohome wrote:

LMAO. Coming from someone who didn;t know that denigrate and disparage were verbs. LMAO. I think you need a re-education on verbs and syntax, brah. LOL. 

See post 19 brah.

Verb catenae must contain at least one nonparaphrasic verb in order for the sentence to be grammatically correct.

- Your friendly neighborhood grammar nazi

Avatar of trysts

No, it's a fish. Google image "Darpa fish":

Avatar of letsgohome
PLAVIN79 wrote:

Stop playing with this person= You do not need this frustation

Frustation is an emotion that derives from the asynchronicity of one's perception and actuality. For if one believes he is smart and there is someone smarter than him it is the choice of the individual to feel frustated( however, someone being smarter than you doesn't necessarily mean you not smart, it just means that someone is smarter than you. Is Anand not a great chess player because Carlsen is better, obviously no. However, this is my opinion if one takes the frustation alternative then they are taking the asinine one, proving that they do suffer symptomatic from stupidity. To be a  true savant is to be in complete control of oneself 99.9% of the time, with the occassional gaffe).  A healthier alternative is to accept this truth( of someone being smarter than you) and emulously try, positively I may add, to better oneself. 

Avatar of trysts

Emulously- of or pertaining to Emus; birdlike; a state of mind similar to that of an Emu.

 Jack walked around emulously while eating seeds and thistles.

Avatar of letsgohome
blueemu wrote:
letsgohome wrote:

LMAO. Coming from someone who didn;t know that denigrate and disparage were verbs. LMAO. I think you need a re-education on verbs and syntax, brah. LOL. 

See post 19 brah.

Verb catenae must contain at least one nonparaphrasic verb in order for the sentence to be grammatically correct.

- Your friendly neighborhood grammar nazi

Yes, but a good writer knows when and how to break the rules as I have stated in post 19, brah.

P.S. Shakespeare did not always follow the rules. Furthermore, how can one be a grammar nazi without knowing that disparage and denigrate are verbs. LMAO. I am still laughing at that rather loudly. I believe that is the most rudimentary prinicple of grammar nazi school, like it has to be written on every wall of the building, " In order to attend this school one must know what a verb is, since it is a touchstone of our whole creed."  LMAO.  I am just imagining it, LOL. 

I have no animosity towards you, just take life as is and learn from mistakes, brah. 

Avatar of letsgohome
trysts wrote:

Emulously- of or pertaining to Emus; birdlike; a state of mind similar to that of an Emu.

 Jack walked around emulously while eating seeds and thistles.

Close, but you did not catch my implied reference. There is a specific reason why I chose the word EMU- lously. LMAO. 

P.S. Emulous means seeking to imitate or emulate someone or something  or motivated by a spirit of rivalry. 

Avatar of blueemu
letsgohome wrote:

Yes, but a good writer knows when and how to break the rules...

Perhaps you should consult one, then.

Avatar of trysts
letsgohome wrote:
trysts wrote:

Emulously- of or pertaining to Emus; birdlike; a state of mind similar to that of an Emu.

 Jack walked around emulously while eating seeds and thistles.

Close, but you did not catch my implied reference. There is a specific reason why I chose the word EMU- lously. LMAO. 

P.S. Emulously means seeking to imitate or emulate someone or something  or motivated by a spirit of rivalry. 

That's a pretty misleading word. It's like saying "pteradactly" means 'to buy a pencil'.

Avatar of blueemu
trysts wrote:

That's a pretty misleading word. It's like saying "pteradactly" means 'to buy a pencil'.

You mean, it doesn't? Frown

Well... I stand corrected.

Avatar of trysts
blueemu wrote:
 

Well... I stand corrected.

I bet a lot of emus wish they can fly correctedFrown

Avatar of letsgohome
letsgohome wrote:
trysts wrote:

Emulously- of or pertaining to Emus; birdlike; a state of mind similar to that of an Emu.

 Jack walked around emulously while eating seeds and thistles.

Close, but you did not catch my implied reference. There is a specific reason why I chose the word EMU- lously. LMAO. 

P.S. Emulously means seeking to imitate or emulate someone or something  or motivated by a spirit of rivalry. 

I guess the reference went completely over your head, huh blueEMU.

Avatar of letsgohome
blueemu wrote:
letsgohome wrote:

Yes, but a good writer knows when and how to break the rules...

Perhaps you should consult one, then.

What if I am one?

Avatar of zapped

letsgohome wrote:

blueemu wrote:

letsgohome wrote:

LMAO. Coming from someone who didn;t know that denigrate and disparage were verbs. LMAO. I think you need a re-education on verbs and syntax, brah. LOL. 

See post 19 brah.

Verb catenae must contain at least one nonparaphrasic verb in order for the sentence to be grammatically correct.

- Your friendly neighborhood grammar nazi

Yes, but a good writer knows when and how to break the rules as I have stated in post 19, brah.

P.S. Shakespeare did not always follow the rules. Furthermore, how can one be a grammar nazi without knowing that disparage and denigrate are verbs. LMAO. I am still laughing at that rather loudly. I believe that is the most rudimentary prinicple of grammar nazi school, like it has to be written on every wall of the building, " In order to attend this school one must know what a verb is, since it is a touchstone of our whole creed."  LMAO.  I am just imagining it, LOL. 

I have no animosity towards you, just take life as is and learn from mistakes, brah. 

Zapped corrects letsgohome on a spelling error: Dear letsgohome: You misspelled the word principle on line 6 of your P.S. comment. Spelling errors are not and will not be tolerated in this forum thread! This is an unacceptable egregious error!

Avatar of letsgohome
zapped wrote:

letsgohome wrote:

blueemu wrote:

letsgohome wrote:

LMAO. Coming from someone who didn;t know that denigrate and disparage were verbs. LMAO. I think you need a re-education on verbs and syntax, brah. LOL. 

See post 19 brah.

Verb catenae must contain at least one nonparaphrasic verb in order for the sentence to be grammatically correct.

- Your friendly neighborhood grammar nazi

Yes, but a good writer knows when and how to break the rules as I have stated in post 19, brah.

P.S. Shakespeare did not always follow the rules. Furthermore, how can one be a grammar nazi without knowing that disparage and denigrate are verbs. LMAO. I am still laughing at that rather loudly. I believe that is the most rudimentary prinicple of grammar nazi school, like it has to be written on every wall of the building, " In order to attend this school one must know what a verb is, since it is a touchstone of our whole creed."  LMAO.  I am just imagining it, LOL. 

I have no animosity towards you, just take life as is and learn from mistakes, brah. 

Zapped corrects letsgohome on a spelling error: Dear letsgohome: You misspelled the word principle on line 6 of your P.S. comment. Spelling errors are not and will not be tolerated in this forum thread! This is an unacceptable egregious error!

Oh thank you my good brah, thank you.

Avatar of letsgohome

......unacceptable, egregious error!  ( not unacceptable egregious error) 

You were missing the comma my good brah. Do you see the synergistic effect? For now we are both better by this encounter, brah.

Avatar of zapped

letsgohome wrote:

zapped wrote:

letsgohome wrote:

blueemu wrote:

letsgohome wrote:

LMAO. Coming from someone who didn;t know that denigrate and disparage were verbs. LMAO. I think you need a re-education on verbs and syntax, brah. LOL. 

See post 19 brah.

Verb catenae must contain at least one nonparaphrasic verb in order for the sentence to be grammatically correct.

- Your friendly neighborhood grammar nazi

Yes, but a good writer knows when and how to break the rules as I have stated in post 19, brah.

P.S. Shakespeare did not always follow the rules. Furthermore, how can one be a grammar nazi without knowing that disparage and denigrate are verbs. LMAO. I am still laughing at that rather loudly. I believe that is the most rudimentary prinicple of grammar nazi school, like it has to be written on every wall of the building, " In order to attend this school one must know what a verb is, since it is a touchstone of our whole creed."  LMAO.  I am just imagining it, LOL. 

I have no animosity towards you, just take life as is and learn from mistakes, brah. 

Zapped corrects letsgohome on a spelling error: Dear letsgohome: You misspelled the word principle on line 6 of your P.S. comment. Spelling errors are not and will not be tolerated in this forum thread! This is an unacceptable egregious error!

letsgohome wrote: Oh thank you my good brah, thank you.

Zapped accepts thanks from letsgohome: Oh you are welcome my good brah.

Avatar of The_Ghostess_Lola

[COMMENT SUSPENDED UNTIL I'M DONE WATCHING THIS MOVIE]