This Is Wrong Chess.com

Sort:
EvidentRoad
AnRun wrote:
Alberthepirate wrote:
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

The TB got removed because they do not want to award it to someone blogging about Hitler. I know that seems to be too much for you to understand but that's how the world works. Why did Mark Zucherberg steal 30 million followers from Elon Musk? ANS.....that's how the world works.

but what is actually wrong with talker about it? it was just a chess game he played

A lot of very naive ppls here. Nazis and fellow travelers go out of their way to pull stunts like this on and off line, then whine about their freeze peach or they were "only " asking questions/having a discussion, etc.

As a history buff, I was somewhat sympathetic to OP. Then we learn he thought a thumbnail of Hitler was a good idea.

No dude, just no. And if you need someone to explain why, then the mods made the right call.

A true history buff would realize that us ignoring certain people and events in history is why USA is screwed right now.

magipi

Anyway, what is the point of writing a ton about an obvious hoax?

Alberthepirate

how is it obvious

2000Knights
AnRun wrote:
Alberthepirate wrote:
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

The TB got removed because they do not want to award it to someone blogging about Hitler. I know that seems to be too much for you to understand but that's how the world works. Why did Mark Zucherberg steal 30 million followers from Elon Musk? ANS.....that's how the world works.

but what is actually wrong with talker about it? it was just a chess game he played

A lot of very naive ppls here. Nazis and fellow travelers go out of their way to pull stunts like this on and off line, then whine about their freeze peach or they were "only " asking questions/having a discussion, etc.

As a history buff, I was somewhat sympathetic to OP. Then we learn he thought a thumbnail of Hitler was a good idea.

No dude, just no. And if you need someone to explain why, then the mods made the right call.

Why is a small reference to Hitler bad? He did not praise him or even talk about what he did, just the game.

Chessking4640
magipi wrote:

Anyway, what is the point of writing a ton about an obvious hoax?

People enjoy these type of content as seen in the comments section

Chessking4640
TheChessKnight2000 wrote:
AnRun wrote:
Alberthepirate wrote:
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

The TB got removed because they do not want to award it to someone blogging about Hitler. I know that seems to be too much for you to understand but that's how the world works. Why did Mark Zucherberg steal 30 million followers from Elon Musk? ANS.....that's how the world works.

but what is actually wrong with talker about it? it was just a chess game he played

A lot of very naive ppls here. Nazis and fellow travelers go out of their way to pull stunts like this on and off line, then whine about their freeze peach or they were "only " asking questions/having a discussion, etc.

As a history buff, I was somewhat sympathetic to OP. Then we learn he thought a thumbnail of Hitler was a good idea.

No dude, just no. And if you need someone to explain why, then the mods made the right call.

Why is a small reference to Hitler bad? He did not praise him or even talk about what he did, just the game.

I agree hes also said that before the blog actually begins.

magipi
Alberthepirate wrote:

how is it obvious

It is about as obviously fake as "Buddha and baby Yoda playing chess".

EvidentRoad
Trophies100 wrote:
TheChessKnight2000 wrote:
AnRun wrote:
Alberthepirate wrote:
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

The TB got removed because they do not want to award it to someone blogging about Hitler. I know that seems to be too much for you to understand but that's how the world works. Why did Mark Zucherberg steal 30 million followers from Elon Musk? ANS.....that's how the world works.

but what is actually wrong with talker about it? it was just a chess game he played

A lot of very naive ppls here. Nazis and fellow travelers go out of their way to pull stunts like this on and off line, then whine about their freeze peach or they were "only " asking questions/having a discussion, etc.

As a history buff, I was somewhat sympathetic to OP. Then we learn he thought a thumbnail of Hitler was a good idea.

No dude, just no. And if you need someone to explain why, then the mods made the right call.

Why is a small reference to Hitler bad? He did not praise him or even talk about what he did, just the game.

I agree hes also said that before the blog actually begins.

exactly. Like making a blog praising Hitler is one thing but something like this is completely cool imo

BotvinnikTal

...

LosTejano

Good luck man.

RonaldJosephCote

Your blog did not break any rules. And the OP is free to continue blogging. Just like Chess.com is free......to award T.B to someone else.

RonaldJosephCote

Look,.....I don't have a dog in this fight, and I completely agree with Chess.com on this. You children want a little soccer trophy for everything you do. When you get to be 66, you'll understand. meh

EvidentRoad
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

Look,.....I don't have a dog in this fight, and I completely agree with Chess.com on this. You children want a little soccer trophy for everything you do. When you get to be 66, you'll understand.

What does that have to do with literally anything? Hornet clearly earned top blogger and they took it away over literally nothing

2000Knights
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

Your blog did not break any rules. And the OP is free to continue blogging. Just like Chess.com is free......to award T.B to someone else.

That is true, chess.com is free to do whatever they want with bloggers. But they don't do it unless they have a good reason to. Again for the 500th time, @HornetCruise did not praise Hitler, we just talked about his game. So chess.com demoted Hornet because its controversial? We here with a goal to get chess.com to notice and to have them consider giving Hornet his title back.

RonaldJosephCote

I'm siding with Chess.com because its the right thing to do. I'm citing with Chess.com because if you yelll FIRE in a crowded movie theater, you could harm people.

EvidentRoad
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

I'm siding with Chess.com because its the right thing to do. I'm citing with Chess.com because if you yelll FIRE in a crowded movie theater, you could harm people.

Why is it the right thing to do?

BotvinnikTal

because we are stoobid people

especially me

RonaldJosephCote

"But they don't do it unless they have a good reason to". Its a RANDOM award. And its the right thing to do because many people have been Top Blogger. They wanna see to it that many more people get to BE.....Top Blogger

2000Knights
EvidentRoad wrote:
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

Look,.....I don't have a dog in this fight, and I completely agree with Chess.com on this. You children want a little soccer trophy for everything you do. When you get to be 66, you'll understand.

What does that have to do with literally anything? Hornet clearly earned top blogger and they took it away over literally nothing

I know that you may be much older then all of us, but Hornet took time on his blogs, he spent sweat, blood and tears, and he clearly deserved the title for his hard work. Its not that we want to be praised for everything we do, we praise Hornet for his hard work, I'm sure you appreciate hard work! And when chess.com demote Hornet because of a misunderstanding, many people will can't see his blogs, its not on the top of the blogs, where he deserved.

RonaldJosephCote

read post 95 And its the right thing to do because many people have been Top Blogger. They wanna see to it that many more people get to BE.....Top Blogger

This forum topic has been locked