upgrade is too expensive
Sort:
I would jump at the chance to pay a bit have a convenient online deep analysis of my games, that doesn't involve exporting and importing. But 100$? I imagine many chess.com users feel similarly, no?
hermantoothrot wrote:
I would jump at the chance to pay a bit have a convenient online deep analysis of my games, that doesn't involve exporting and importing. But 100$? I imagine many chess.com users feel similarly, no?
Herman, as a man with tooth rot, you can be no stranger to $100 extractions. As they say, pay me now or pay me later...
/ I pay only $49. I find the analysis level more than sufficient.
Here is your last game. You were white:
| Strength | White | Black |
|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 11 | 12 |
| Good | 6 | 5 |
| Inaccuracy (?!) | 4 | 4 |
| Mistake (?) | 2 | 1 |
| Blunder (??) | 3 | 4 |
| Forced | 0 | 0 |
| Best Move | 30.4% | 33.3% |
| Avg. Diff | 1.06 | 0.92 |
It looks deep enough to me. You might even get away with the $29 subscription version.
Indeed, you are right. Yet, if I was to redirect funds from my dental care, I would no longer be able to play, thanks to the toothaches I would suffer.
Thank you for the game analysis, but as we all know, these deep think services are available for free. It was the convenience I referenced as possibly worth a trip to the penny jar. The convenience is what I was talking about! Which, dear friend, you seem to have glossed over.
hermantoothrot wrote:
Indeed, you are right. Yet, if I was to redirect funds from my dental care, I would no longer be able to play, thanks to the toothaches I would suffer.
Thank you for the game analysis, but as we all know, these deep think services are available for free. It was the convenience I referenced as possibly worth a trip to the penny jar. The convenience is what I was talking about! Which, dear friend, you seem to have glossed over.
I saw that you wanted the convenience and noted that you wouldn't need $100 to achieve it.
I am very satisfied with the analysis level provided with my $49 subscription, which I ran and posted to show you.
It is also possible that the analysis available at the $29 level would satisfy you, though I haven't tried it.
hermantoothrot wrote:
I would jump at the chance to pay a bit have a convenient online deep analysis of my games, that doesn't involve exporting and importing. But 100$? I imagine many chess.com users feel similarly, no?
I pay the $100. A little more than $10 a month. Which is equivalent to one Starbucks coffee per week.
The only true problem is that I find chess more addictive than coffee. 
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.