Vote Chess - Chess.com vs. a Grandmaster!



It's Susan Polgar and she's going to be playing NAKED!!
Actually, I think vote chess is a sure win for a GM. It's just a matter of probability. There are more losing moves that wining moves in most scenarios and average players are less likely to select winning moves than GMs. In a difficult position, matched against a GM, a large number of average players, voting to move, has a much higher probability of selecting a non-winning move. It might be more a interesting experiment to pit an average player against the chess.com community.

It's Susan Polgar and she's going to be playing NAKED!!
It doesn't matter whether she is naked or not. You want see her anyways- it's internet chess!!!!
It's Susan Polgar and she's going to be playing NAKED!!
Actually, I think vote chess is a sure win for a GM. It's just a matter of probability. There are more losing moves that wining moves in most scenarios and average players are less likely to select winning moves than GMs. In a difficult position, matched against a GM, a large number of average players, voting to move, has a much higher probability of selecting a non-winning move. It might be more a interesting experiment to pit an average player against the chess.com community.
I am not totally that would be the case. Most likely if the community discussed every move in a thread, some high level player would be able to convince everyone of the best move, which would result in everyone voting for it. But of course that's not always the case.
I think this should be very interesting, although the quantity of many chess players might not equal the quality of one chess player.

Actually, I think vote chess is a sure win for a GM. It's just a matter of probability. There are more losing moves that wining moves in most scenarios and average players are less likely to select winning moves than GMs. In a difficult position, matched against a GM, a large number of average players, voting to move, has a much higher probability of selecting a non-winning move. It might be more a interesting experiment to pit an average player against the chess.com community.
EXCELLENT insight, I couldn't have said it better myself. The weak players will undoubtedly select weak moves, and even if another GM happened to join the Chess.com group, his moves would surely get outvoted by all of the weaker players.

I am not totally that would be the case. Most likely if the community discussed every move in a thread, some high level player would be able to convince everyone of the best move, which would result in everyone voting for it. But of course that's not always the case.
I think this should be very interesting, although the quantity of many chess players might not equal the quality of one chess player.
"Might not"? We're talking about a GM here, mind you. And I can guarantee you that the many (us) definitely does not equal a GM. Also, if everyone listened to the advice of a "high level player" before each move, then doesn't this defeat the whole purpose of the event? In other words, why not let your "high rated player" take on the GM by himself without having to bother justifying his moves to everyone else?
I just wanted to let everyone know that we have a well-known Grandmaster who is going to be playing against everyone at Chess.com in March! I'm excited!