Why Chess.com is not a safe place for women

Sort:
Avatar of Mid-KnightRider
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
SixInchSamurai wrote:

Armed women, criminals, some guy on an air bed...

It seems I have lost the line of the thread...

Basically this guy went "liberals are crazy these days "

And brought up the second amendment and it derealed from there

I'm right though. PS. I am a conservative, not republican.

Not rly better regulations on gun laws =less death rates from guns

Criminals are always gonna have guns through black market, smuggling them, stealing them, buying from other states, why shouldn't civilians have them too?

They can you just should regulate it more besides most people wouldn't go through the trouble of going to a black market anyway or know how to

And most people aren't criminals.

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
AnastasiaStyles wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:

Have you ever heard of an armed woman who knows how to do self defense get abused badly?

Yes. Many. Mostly by partners, family, friends that were trusted in error, etc.

That is the reality of abuse and related crimes that cannot be named here, not someone who jumps out of the bushes wearing a ski mask.

I really haven't, could you name a few, sorry. PS. the only time I have heard of a man attacking a woman who knew self defense, he was a hired hitman, and didn't make it out alive.

That's unlikely and rare and most people would rather not talk about it and just move on but there's plenty of cases sometimes random sometimes friends

Now compare that to unarmed women.

could just do it when they are unarrmend and wait that's really only talking about random street thugs which sure could help but wouldn't it be better if they also didn't have a weapon and you could just run away ?

You, as most liberals are utterly clueless on crime, enough said.

Not rly you give people more access to weapons and deregulate laws regarding use you get more opportunities for people to abuse the laws it's not like they shouldn't defend themselves

Avatar of Mid-KnightRider
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
AnastasiaStyles wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:

Have you ever heard of an armed woman who knows how to do self defense get abused badly?

Yes. Many. Mostly by partners, family, friends that were trusted in error, etc.

That is the reality of abuse and related crimes that cannot be named here, not someone who jumps out of the bushes wearing a ski mask.

I really haven't, could you name a few, sorry. PS. the only time I have heard of a man attacking a woman who knew self defense, he was a hired hitman, and didn't make it out alive.

That's unlikely and rare and most people would rather not talk about it and just move on but there's plenty of cases sometimes random sometimes friends

Now compare that to unarmed women.

could just do it when they are unarrmend and wait that's really only talking about random street thugs which sure could help but wouldn't it be better if they also didn't have a weapon and you could just run away ?

You, as most liberals are utterly clueless on crime, enough said.

Not rly you give people more access to weapons and deregulate laws regarding use you get more opportunities for people to abuse the laws it's not like they shouldn't defend themselves

Criminals are gonna have weapons either way, civilians need to be able to defend themselves.

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
AnastasiaStyles wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:

Have you ever heard of an armed woman who knows how to do self defense get abused badly?

Yes. Many. Mostly by partners, family, friends that were trusted in error, etc.

That is the reality of abuse and related crimes that cannot be named here, not someone who jumps out of the bushes wearing a ski mask.

I really haven't, could you name a few, sorry. PS. the only time I have heard of a man attacking a woman who knew self defense, he was a hired hitman, and didn't make it out alive.

That's unlikely and rare and most people would rather not talk about it and just move on but there's plenty of cases sometimes random sometimes friends

Now compare that to unarmed women.

could just do it when they are unarrmend and wait that's really only talking about random street thugs which sure could help but wouldn't it be better if they also didn't have a weapon and you could just run away ?

You, as most liberals are utterly clueless on crime, enough said.

Not rly you give people more access to weapons and deregulate laws regarding use you get more opportunities for people to abuse the laws it's not like they shouldn't defend themselves

Criminals are gonna have weapons either way, civilians need to be able to defend themselves.

When you give criminals more access to weapons you get more criminals hense why we have one of the highest death rates from guns compared to other first world countries

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
AnastasiaStyles wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:

Have you ever heard of an armed woman who knows how to do self defense get abused badly?

Yes. Many. Mostly by partners, family, friends that were trusted in error, etc.

That is the reality of abuse and related crimes that cannot be named here, not someone who jumps out of the bushes wearing a ski mask.

I really haven't, could you name a few, sorry. PS. the only time I have heard of a man attacking a woman who knew self defense, he was a hired hitman, and didn't make it out alive.

That's unlikely and rare and most people would rather not talk about it and just move on but there's plenty of cases sometimes random sometimes friends

Now compare that to unarmed women.

could just do it when they are unarrmend and wait that's really only talking about random street thugs which sure could help but wouldn't it be better if they also didn't have a weapon and you could just run away ?

You, as most liberals are utterly clueless on crime, enough said.

Not rly you give people more access to weapons and deregulate laws regarding use you get more opportunities for people to abuse the laws it's not like they shouldn't defend themselves

Criminals are gonna have weapons either way, civilians need to be able to defend themselves.

Think of it like this its like how people can take a couple years to drive a car and you need to pasctice a couple years before you can use it properly

You say anyone can drive a car with no practice what happens ?

Avatar of Mid-KnightRider
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
AnastasiaStyles wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:

Have you ever heard of an armed woman who knows how to do self defense get abused badly?

Yes. Many. Mostly by partners, family, friends that were trusted in error, etc.

That is the reality of abuse and related crimes that cannot be named here, not someone who jumps out of the bushes wearing a ski mask.

I really haven't, could you name a few, sorry. PS. the only time I have heard of a man attacking a woman who knew self defense, he was a hired hitman, and didn't make it out alive.

That's unlikely and rare and most people would rather not talk about it and just move on but there's plenty of cases sometimes random sometimes friends

Now compare that to unarmed women.

could just do it when they are unarrmend and wait that's really only talking about random street thugs which sure could help but wouldn't it be better if they also didn't have a weapon and you could just run away ?

You, as most liberals are utterly clueless on crime, enough said.

Not rly you give people more access to weapons and deregulate laws regarding use you get more opportunities for people to abuse the laws it's not like they shouldn't defend themselves

Criminals are gonna have weapons either way, civilians need to be able to defend themselves.

When you give criminals more access to weapons you get more criminals hense why we have one of the highest death rates from guns compared to other first world countries

MORE access, criminals have as much access to guns as they want, civilians don't, giving criminals a huge advantage, which is why we have so many gun related deaths.

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
AnastasiaStyles wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:

Have you ever heard of an armed woman who knows how to do self defense get abused badly?

Yes. Many. Mostly by partners, family, friends that were trusted in error, etc.

That is the reality of abuse and related crimes that cannot be named here, not someone who jumps out of the bushes wearing a ski mask.

I really haven't, could you name a few, sorry. PS. the only time I have heard of a man attacking a woman who knew self defense, he was a hired hitman, and didn't make it out alive.

That's unlikely and rare and most people would rather not talk about it and just move on but there's plenty of cases sometimes random sometimes friends

Now compare that to unarmed women.

could just do it when they are unarrmend and wait that's really only talking about random street thugs which sure could help but wouldn't it be better if they also didn't have a weapon and you could just run away ?

You, as most liberals are utterly clueless on crime, enough said.

Not rly you give people more access to weapons and deregulate laws regarding use you get more opportunities for people to abuse the laws it's not like they shouldn't defend themselves

Criminals are gonna have weapons either way, civilians need to be able to defend themselves.

When you give criminals more access to weapons you get more criminals hense why we have one of the highest death rates from guns compared to other first world countries

MORE access, criminals have as much access to guns as they want, civilians don't, giving criminals a huge advantage, which is why we have so many gun related deaths.

That's not how that works it isnt that hard to get a gun a couple of my family members have some

Avatar of Mid-KnightRider
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
AnastasiaStyles wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:

Have you ever heard of an armed woman who knows how to do self defense get abused badly?

Yes. Many. Mostly by partners, family, friends that were trusted in error, etc.

That is the reality of abuse and related crimes that cannot be named here, not someone who jumps out of the bushes wearing a ski mask.

I really haven't, could you name a few, sorry. PS. the only time I have heard of a man attacking a woman who knew self defense, he was a hired hitman, and didn't make it out alive.

That's unlikely and rare and most people would rather not talk about it and just move on but there's plenty of cases sometimes random sometimes friends

Now compare that to unarmed women.

could just do it when they are unarrmend and wait that's really only talking about random street thugs which sure could help but wouldn't it be better if they also didn't have a weapon and you could just run away ?

You, as most liberals are utterly clueless on crime, enough said.

Not rly you give people more access to weapons and deregulate laws regarding use you get more opportunities for people to abuse the laws it's not like they shouldn't defend themselves

Criminals are gonna have weapons either way, civilians need to be able to defend themselves.

Think of it like this its like how people can take a couple years to drive a car and you need to pasctice a couple years before you can use it properly

You say anyone can drive a car with no practice what happens ?

They crash, that's why we have driving classes, and gun ranges, ideally you will never need to use the gun, but having it makes you 10X as safe.

Avatar of Mid-KnightRider
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
AnastasiaStyles wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:

Have you ever heard of an armed woman who knows how to do self defense get abused badly?

Yes. Many. Mostly by partners, family, friends that were trusted in error, etc.

That is the reality of abuse and related crimes that cannot be named here, not someone who jumps out of the bushes wearing a ski mask.

I really haven't, could you name a few, sorry. PS. the only time I have heard of a man attacking a woman who knew self defense, he was a hired hitman, and didn't make it out alive.

That's unlikely and rare and most people would rather not talk about it and just move on but there's plenty of cases sometimes random sometimes friends

Now compare that to unarmed women.

could just do it when they are unarrmend and wait that's really only talking about random street thugs which sure could help but wouldn't it be better if they also didn't have a weapon and you could just run away ?

You, as most liberals are utterly clueless on crime, enough said.

Not rly you give people more access to weapons and deregulate laws regarding use you get more opportunities for people to abuse the laws it's not like they shouldn't defend themselves

Criminals are gonna have weapons either way, civilians need to be able to defend themselves.

When you give criminals more access to weapons you get more criminals hense why we have one of the highest death rates from guns compared to other first world countries

MORE access, criminals have as much access to guns as they want, civilians don't, giving criminals a huge advantage, which is why we have so many gun related deaths.

That's not how that works it isnt that hard to get a gun a couple of my family members have some

That's great what state are you in?

Avatar of SixInchSamurai

We need da Batman against armed criminals on air beds

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
AnastasiaStyles wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:

Have you ever heard of an armed woman who knows how to do self defense get abused badly?

Yes. Many. Mostly by partners, family, friends that were trusted in error, etc.

That is the reality of abuse and related crimes that cannot be named here, not someone who jumps out of the bushes wearing a ski mask.

I really haven't, could you name a few, sorry. PS. the only time I have heard of a man attacking a woman who knew self defense, he was a hired hitman, and didn't make it out alive.

That's unlikely and rare and most people would rather not talk about it and just move on but there's plenty of cases sometimes random sometimes friends

Now compare that to unarmed women.

could just do it when they are unarrmend and wait that's really only talking about random street thugs which sure could help but wouldn't it be better if they also didn't have a weapon and you could just run away ?

You, as most liberals are utterly clueless on crime, enough said.

Not rly you give people more access to weapons and deregulate laws regarding use you get more opportunities for people to abuse the laws it's not like they shouldn't defend themselves

Criminals are gonna have weapons either way, civilians need to be able to defend themselves.

Think of it like this its like how people can take a couple years to drive a car and you need to pasctice a couple years before you can use it properly

You say anyone can drive a car with no practice what happens ?

They crash, that's why we have driving classes, and gun ranges, ideally you will never need to use the gun, but having it makes you 10X as safe.

Better to have more regulations and practice first which is harder to do when you deregulate laws and not rly when everyone else can also have a gun just cause you can shoot someone else down doesnt mean they can't shoot you first

Avatar of Mid-KnightRider
SixInchSamurai wrote:

We need da Batman against armed criminals on air beds

You are so lost.

Avatar of Mid-KnightRider
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
AnastasiaStyles wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:

Have you ever heard of an armed woman who knows how to do self defense get abused badly?

Yes. Many. Mostly by partners, family, friends that were trusted in error, etc.

That is the reality of abuse and related crimes that cannot be named here, not someone who jumps out of the bushes wearing a ski mask.

I really haven't, could you name a few, sorry. PS. the only time I have heard of a man attacking a woman who knew self defense, he was a hired hitman, and didn't make it out alive.

That's unlikely and rare and most people would rather not talk about it and just move on but there's plenty of cases sometimes random sometimes friends

Now compare that to unarmed women.

could just do it when they are unarrmend and wait that's really only talking about random street thugs which sure could help but wouldn't it be better if they also didn't have a weapon and you could just run away ?

You, as most liberals are utterly clueless on crime, enough said.

Not rly you give people more access to weapons and deregulate laws regarding use you get more opportunities for people to abuse the laws it's not like they shouldn't defend themselves

Criminals are gonna have weapons either way, civilians need to be able to defend themselves.

Think of it like this its like how people can take a couple years to drive a car and you need to pasctice a couple years before you can use it properly

You say anyone can drive a car with no practice what happens ?

They crash, that's why we have driving classes, and gun ranges, ideally you will never need to use the gun, but having it makes you 10X as safe.

Better to have more regulations and practice first which is harder to do when you deregulate laws and not rly when everyone else can also have a gun just cause you can shoot someone else down doesnt mean they can't shoot you first

Criminals don't know how much experience you have, just that they would rather not have a bullet right between their eyes.

Avatar of Mid-KnightRider
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
AnastasiaStyles wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:

Have you ever heard of an armed woman who knows how to do self defense get abused badly?

Yes. Many. Mostly by partners, family, friends that were trusted in error, etc.

That is the reality of abuse and related crimes that cannot be named here, not someone who jumps out of the bushes wearing a ski mask.

I really haven't, could you name a few, sorry. PS. the only time I have heard of a man attacking a woman who knew self defense, he was a hired hitman, and didn't make it out alive.

That's unlikely and rare and most people would rather not talk about it and just move on but there's plenty of cases sometimes random sometimes friends

Now compare that to unarmed women.

could just do it when they are unarrmend and wait that's really only talking about random street thugs which sure could help but wouldn't it be better if they also didn't have a weapon and you could just run away ?

You, as most liberals are utterly clueless on crime, enough said.

Not rly you give people more access to weapons and deregulate laws regarding use you get more opportunities for people to abuse the laws it's not like they shouldn't defend themselves

Criminals are gonna have weapons either way, civilians need to be able to defend themselves.

Think of it like this its like how people can take a couple years to drive a car and you need to pasctice a couple years before you can use it properly

You say anyone can drive a car with no practice what happens ?

They crash, that's why we have driving classes, and gun ranges, ideally you will never need to use the gun, but having it makes you 10X as safe.

Better to have more regulations and practice first which is harder to do when you deregulate laws and not rly when everyone else can also have a gun just cause you can shoot someone else down doesnt mean they can't shoot you first

As far as I know we both have the best intentions, just disagree on execution, let's just agree to disagree.

Avatar of SixInchSamurai

> You are so lost

Yes, I look at the thread's title, then at the last couple of pages, then at the title again and feel really lost

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
SixInchSamurai wrote:

> You are so lost

Yes, I look at the thread's title, then at the last couple of pages, then at the title again and feel really lost

Better then taking about a

Possibly ai generated YouTube video

Avatar of Mid-KnightRider
SixInchSamurai wrote:

> You are so lost

Yes, I look at the thread's title, then at the last couple of pages, then at the title again and feel really lost

sorry man, we are talking about how women can defend themselves in the realworld, the airbed was a sidejab at @BasixWhiteBoy for trolling women.

Avatar of Mid-KnightRider
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
SixInchSamurai wrote:

> You are so lost

Yes, I look at the thread's title, then at the last couple of pages, then at the title again and feel really lost

Better then taking about a

Possibly ai generated YouTube video

It really is.

Avatar of SixInchSamurai

> Possibly ai generated YouTube video

I did not even watch it, the title is enough

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
SixInchSamurai wrote:

> You are so lost

Yes, I look at the thread's title, then at the last couple of pages, then at the title again and feel really lost

sorry man, we are talking about how women can defend themselves in the realworld, the airbed was a sidejab at @BasixWhiteBoy for trolling women.

Nah you just mentioned second amendment and it got derealed from there

This forum topic has been locked