White can promote both pawns to a queen, but either results in instant mate in 1 by the rook! Kf8 leads to the same mate, and kd8 allows the black king to win both pawns! F8 = N+ is the only winning move to deflect the black king from the mating net and then promote the g pawn to a queen winning! Very realistic endgame! It's also important to point out that unlike most underpromotion studies, where the underpromotion turns a loss into a draw, or an otherwise drawn game into a win, this is the only one I know of where the Underpromotion turns a Loss into a win. Any other piece promotion loses, and the only promotion that doesn't lose, wins.
Best UnderPromotion Endgame Compilation
The position I posted early on with the promotion to 8 consecutive Knights, as well one involving a rook vs 2 pawns endgame, underpromotion was both the only way to win and the only way to not lose. In both cases because the side about to promote was under a mating attack and promoting to knights for example, were the only way to give checks. Oh and another simple example of this:
Anything else loses.
Just thought I would post the original 8 Knights underpromotion mate in 8 that your favorite 8 Knights underpromotion STUDY is derived from. It's a mate in 8 by American composer William Shinkman from 1908:
Which André Chéron turned into a study in 1964:
And André Chéron created another DIRECT MATE in 8 for the 8 Knights underpromotion, again in 1964:
If I'm correct the added pieces makes it so that not only is it the only way to win, it's the only way not to lose.
If I'm correct the added pieces makes it so that not only is it the only way to win, it's the only way not to lose.
Well I think that was established earlier in this thread by @MARattigan in #269 AND @Rocky64 in #272, I was just pointing out where the original idea came from.
Here's a very nice study that has 3 mandatory underpromotions in it to seal the victory:
White to move and win
This is the first one I've seen that requires 2 opposite colored bishops underpromotions, love it. Adding this to my collection for sure.
Another great bishop underpromotion example I found online: