Just to show you an error.
You are probably right.. But: what error are you referring to? A grammatical error perhaps?
Just to show you an error.
You are probably right.. But: what error are you referring to? A grammatical error perhaps?
It is a no-brainer IF you know how to do it (mate with K+B+N vs K) I don't care how many GMs don't know it. It takes a max of 33
Disclosure: I still can't mate with K+3 Kts vs K, which is another "basic mate" demonstrated in BCE.
The diagram is #4 from BCE: "Black to move, White mates in 33" (I told the stupid game editor here it was BLACK TO MOVE, but it didn't believe me)
You cannot win with just 2 knights(unless your opponent don't know how to play!!
)