Is Rook and a pawn vs queen draw in this position?

Sort:
Avatar of Arisktotle
MAHAKAAL03 wrote:

i dont think there is zugzwang because ideal position for rook is on 3rd rank's 2 squares that are in pawn's eyes

and black does not have any piece to block rook's movement ob them

Indeed, there is no zugzwang here. I only added it to indicate that it is not enough to have an impenetrable fortress - you must also be able to maintain it when forced to move. There are similar positions with the same material where that proves a fatal weakness in the "fortress". I don't remember one currently but I've seen them 50 years ago!

Avatar of T-800-Deadly_Assassin
Arisktotle wrote:
MAHAKAAL03 wrote:

i dont think there is zugzwang because ideal position for rook is on 3rd rank's 2 squares that are in pawn's eyes

and black does not have any piece to block rook's movement ob them

Indeed, there is no zugzwang here. I only added it to indicate that it is not enough to have an impenetrable fortress - you must also be able to maintain it when forced to move. There are similar positions with the same material where that proves a fatal weakness in the "fortress". I don't remember one currently but I've seen them 50 years ago!

Wow that's amazing please post them if you remember them

Avatar of Sogood135367

It is still a draw if the black king is beyond white's 3rd rank, but the pawn MUST be on it's starting square. If you move everything in that position one square up black wins cuz the queen has more space to get behind the pawn and drive the defending king away.

For,example, even with queen side having a pawn on the b file the position you gave is a draw. With the queen having a pawn in that position it is a draw as long as the black king is beyond white's third rank. If it is below the queen wins. Put it in a tablebase to find out how.

Moving everything in your position one square up results in a win for the queen.
Avatar of itismeak

..