Hi.
I’m quite methodical. My daily chess activity goes more or less like this:
- 1 rapid, rated game ( 15|10 ) : focus and stress
- revision of that game
- a lot of puzzles: not much useful, but I like solving them. I need my daily fix.
Plus, sometimes: 1 rapid, casual game ( 10|10, or 15|10 ): focus without stress
or 2 or 3 blitz, casual games ( 5|3 ) : low level of concentration, just for fun
Occasionally: a video like the ones available here
Overall, 30 to 60 minutes dedicated to playing, every day.
I wonder, and I ask you, if I should play a little more.
I mean: to learn to play well is it absolutely necessary to play a lot, or can that be okay too ?
Thank you.
It depends entirely on your goals and your other responsibilities, things that no one here knows.
What is your (realistic) goal in chess?
To be able to play well in casual games with friends and acquaintances? You are already there. To become a Grandmaster? 1500? What?
When you say you do revisions of your games, how extensive is that? Do you simply run Game Review and look for blunders and brilliancies?
It says you resigned this game.
Why?
Hi.
I’m quite methodical. My daily chess activity goes more or less like this:
- 1 rapid, rated game ( 15|10 ) : focus and stress
- revision of that game
- a lot of puzzles: not much useful, but I like solving them. I need my daily fix.
Plus, sometimes: 1 rapid, casual game ( 10|10, or 15|10 ): focus without stress
or 2 or 3 blitz, casual games ( 5|3 ) : low level of concentration, just for fun
Occasionally: a video like the ones available here
Overall, 30 to 60 minutes dedicated to playing, every day.
I wonder, and I ask you, if I should play a little more.
I mean: to learn to play well is it absolutely necessary to play a lot, or can that be okay too ?
Thank you.