coaching
Sort:
Coaching players rated 300 and under
How much do you charge?
Jul 29, 2021
0
#5
Yes but at 1000 you could be sharing the wrong knowledge becuase if you had knowledge you would be higher than 1000. I am 1000 and no way in heck I would ever think I should share what I think I know
Anybody can teach what they know. @chessking1455 do you cause 300 and under I know you could help them at least get to 600. 🤜🏾💯🤛🏾
Jul 29, 2021
0
#7
Yes, but you could teach the wrong things, because if you knew the right things you would be implementing them yourself.
Jul 29, 2021
0
#8
Maybe they are implementing them and that’s why they are improving over 1000- you don’t know unless you find out what they’re teaching. If you’re hundreds of points higher than who you’re teaching you have to have some gems of knowledge to share that’ll be useful to them. Point is don’t shade others for offering to share what they know. Better having a community trying to grow together with Han cut each other down.
@kxkmate 🤜🏾💯🤛🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
Suck At Chess?
I have a course that will lift your chess skills to new heights
For intermediates, amateurs and beginners.
from 100 ratings to 1600 and from 1600 to master.
Just msg me back and you'll be able to check out the course for free before any price.
Jul 31, 2021
0
#11
How some players can clumsily control the timer, where is the sporting ethic? I've been trying to post on the forum for a few days now, I think I'm being censored too, my doubts aren't being shared with the Chess community, is this censorship? or some support for stopwatch controllers?
Jul 31, 2021
0
#12
ChiefWater wrote:
How some players can clumsily control the timer, where is the sporting ethic? I've been trying to post on the forum for a few days now, I think I'm being censored too, my doubts aren't being shared with the Chess community, is this censorship? or some support for stopwatch controllers?
why are you spamming this topic with your inquiry?
Jul 31, 2021
0
#14
Chuck639 wrote:
I don’t see how a 600 Rapid player is qualified to coach?
oh but chuck accoring to GeminKnight and others you are qualified as long as you are better than the person you are teaching
Jul 31, 2021
0
#15
What would the qualifications be otherwise? Only super GM’s can teach since others may likely give bad info? Let’s be realistic here.
Jul 31, 2021
0
#16
KxKmate wrote:
What would the qualifications be otherwise? Only super GM’s can teach since others may likely give bad info? Let’s be realistic here.
Blind leading the blind. Somebody analyze this game:
https://www.chess.com/game/live/21413482265?username=chessking1455
Jul 31, 2021
0
#17
KxKmate wrote:
What would the qualifications be otherwise? Only super GM’s can teach since others may likely give bad info? Let’s be realistic here.
Lets use some logic and reasoning because it doesn’t add up. How can the OP be only at 600 after 900 rapid games?
That is a huge red flag. Second red flag is his struggling winning percentage at the beginner level.
Please explain.
Tacos
Great!You can start by teaching these <300 first!
Oh wait
Chuck639 写道:
KxKmate wrote:
What would the qualifications be otherwise? Only super GM’s can teach since others may likely give bad info? Let’s be realistic here.
Blind leading the blind. Somebody analyze this game:
https://www.chess.com/game/live/21413482265?username=chessking1455
"Alright so in this opening you can play Qh5 after white played Nf6 to develop"