For Beginners

Sort:
Avatar of ArnavIsHereForu

For beginner chess players, focus on fundamental principles: control the centre with pawns, develop pieces (knights and bishops) early towards the centre, castle your king to safety, and avoid bringing the queen out too soon. (I am a 174 elo player, but I have been playing chess for 2 years now)

Avatar of Just_an_average_player136
RIGZEN24 wrote:

No you joined in 2024

Playing chess does not mean chess.com

Avatar of Just_an_average_player136

I've known how to play chess since I was 6 but I only made my account last year

Avatar of Just_an_average_player136

Technically I only started playing chess properly like 2 years ago

Avatar of GarrisonEM

I created an account not long ago, but I play very rarely. I just played against a bot and ended in a draw, even though he had only one king left. I still don't quite understand how it works, especially who the king can beat and who he can't. After my brain boils over with thoughts, I come here and relax in an atmosphere of pleasant and simple games that are no worse than chess, even better because they bring not only a good mood and relaxation but also pleasant bonuses for winning.

Avatar of OldDoodleHead

Your game was a draw because the same position was played three times.

Avatar of whatisenpassant1
ArnavIsHereForu wrote:

For beginner chess players, focus on fundamental principles: control the centre with pawns, develop pieces (knights and bishops) early towards the centre, castle your king to safety, and avoid bringing the queen out too soon.

I'll add on to this. In the middle game, try not to blunder your pieces, and if that's difficult just focus on keeping your rook and queen alive. Learn basic endgames like king vs king + queen and king vs king + rook and how to win them. Learn basic mating patterns like ladder mate and backrank mate.

If you do just this much I'm sure you'll surpass 600 elo in no time.

Avatar of AtomicPilot
Thanks for the advice 🙂
Avatar of Weirdgerman

Why is a 170 giving advice?

Avatar of whatisenpassant1
Weirdgerman wrote:

Why is a 170 giving advice?

Is any of their advice wrong?

Avatar of whatisenpassant1

Their elo mainly just depicts how well they can apply the advice (and also their blunders, but that's a different story), not their knowledge about it

Avatar of Weirdgerman
whatisenpassant1 hat geschrieben:

Their elo mainly just depicts how well they can apply the advice (and also their blunders, but that's a different story), not their knowledge about it

We need knowledge, not chatgpt bs. Are you gonna take your finance advice from a rich guy or a poor guy?

Avatar of whatisenpassant1
Weirdgerman wrote:
whatisenpassant1 hat geschrieben:

Their elo mainly just depicts how well they can apply the advice (and also their blunders, but that's a different story), not their knowledge about it

We need knowledge, not chatgpt bs. Are you gonna take your finance advice from a rich guy or a poor guy?

Fair analogy, i accept my mistake

Avatar of Mowie714
👍
Avatar of Weirdgerman
whatisenpassant1 hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:
whatisenpassant1 hat geschrieben:

Their elo mainly just depicts how well they can apply the advice (and also their blunders, but that's a different story), not their knowledge about it

We need knowledge, not chatgpt bs. Are you gonna take your finance advice from a rich guy or a poor guy?

Fair analogy, i accept my mistake

Nice. I have nothing against anyone giving advice, but if youre completely new to chess and try to give advice to more experienced players by using AI, i just think its a little snobby and disrespectful.to players who actually worked hard and have actual experience

Avatar of Weirdgerman

Also, anyone who plays chess for 2 years shouldnt be below 300.

Avatar of whatisenpassant1
Weirdgerman wrote:

Also, anyone who plays chess for 2 years shouldnt be below 300.

What if they just never wanted to improve? Maybe they just have fun spamming random premoves in bullet, i know i do

Avatar of Weirdgerman
whatisenpassant1 hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:

Also, anyone who plays chess for 2 years shouldnt be below 300.

What if they just never wanted to improve? Maybe they just have fun spamming random premoves in bullet, i know i do

That is great, but then why are they giving advice. I know tons of 100s that just have fun playing, and i love that people can be so chill, but not a single one of them would ever give advice

Avatar of whatisenpassant1
Weirdgerman wrote:
whatisenpassant1 hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:

Also, anyone who plays chess for 2 years shouldnt be below 300.

What if they just never wanted to improve? Maybe they just have fun spamming random premoves in bullet, i know i do

That is great, but then why are they giving advice. I know tons of 100s that just have fun playing, and i love that people can be so chill, but not a single one of them would ever give advice

I mean people can give advice while being chill, but then it wouldn't really be their advice, would it? you have a fair point

Avatar of Weirdgerman
whatisenpassant1 hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:
whatisenpassant1 hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:

Also, anyone who plays chess for 2 years shouldnt be below 300.

What if they just never wanted to improve? Maybe they just have fun spamming random premoves in bullet, i know i do

That is great, but then why are they giving advice. I know tons of 100s that just have fun playing, and i love that people can be so chill, but not a single one of them would ever give advice

I mean people can give advice while being chill, but then it wouldn't really be their advice, would it? you have a fair point

Well yeah, he used AI. Its just all the chill 100s i know, know that they are bad and wouldnt dare give even.sm1 elses advice (just a personal opinion)