How to exploit a bad opening

Sort:
taseredbirdinstinct
RAU4ever wrote:

You proof my point for me. In the past I've made many long posts trying to help people. You I will never help.

That is your choice, not mine, although I can guarantee that you are acting this way because you harbour some sort of dislike towards me, I believe in free will so I don't think it should ever be my choice whether someone else decides to help me or not, although I do admit that I would never allow the fact that I dislike someone to stop me from offering help to somebody, I used to be like that in the past in regards to not helping people who I dislike, although I admit it's not something I believe in doing anymore.

RAU4ever
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:
RAU4ever wrote:

You proof my point for me. In the past I've made many long posts trying to help people. You I will never help.

That is your choice, not mine, although I can guarantee that you are acting this way because you harbour some sort of dislike towards me, I believe in free will so I don't think it should ever be my choice whether someone else decides to help me or not, although I do admit that I would never allow the fact that I dislike someone to stop me from offering help to somebody, I used to be like that in the past in regards to not helping people who I dislike, although I admit it's not something I believe in doing anymore.

Yet you tell people to 'shut up'. Much more enlightened indeed. 

taseredbirdinstinct
RAU4ever wrote:
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:
RAU4ever wrote:

You proof my point for me. In the past I've made many long posts trying to help people. You I will never help.

That is your choice, not mine, although I can guarantee that you are acting this way because you harbour some sort of dislike towards me, I believe in free will so I don't think it should ever be my choice whether someone else decides to help me or not, although I do admit that I would never allow the fact that I dislike someone to stop me from offering help to somebody, I used to be like that in the past in regards to not helping people who I dislike, although I admit it's not something I believe in doing anymore.

Yet you tell people to 'shut up'. Much more enlightened indeed. 

What's wrong with saying "shut up" to people?

Jalex13
I mean it’s kind of rude and childish if you think about it
taseredbirdinstinct
Jalex13 wrote:
I mean it’s kind of rude and childish if you think about it

It is only rude based on the circumstances. It is only childish in the face of selfish gain.

InsertInterestingNameHere

Final thing I’m going to say before I leave, you need to learn more about chess before you try and correct people. You constantly argue against people triple your rating, and you ask for advice, and then argue against that advice. You’re acting like a know-it-all, and that is somebody that is difficult to help.

taseredbirdinstinct
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:

Final thing I’m going to say before I leave, you need to learn more about chess before you try and correct people. You constantly argue against people triple your rating, and you ask for advice, and then argue against that advice. You’re acting like a know-it-all, and that is somebody that is difficult to help.

No, the fact that you know a lot more about chess than somebody else doesn't you or anybody here to be an elitist, snobby and condescending person, I see a small percentage of posters here who went out of their way to clarify and answer all my questions, I don't care how high rated NervesofButter is, the way he went about things wasn't acceptable, It is never an excuse, you aren't some sort of drill seargent or police constable, so I don't see the need for an authoritarian attitude based on your chess ratings, unless of course you would be happy to be in the room with an arrogant, pompous Bobby Fischer, trust me, being 2800+ and a complete prick is never an excuse, it's just a game at the end of the day, otherwise we might as well start lapping up to professional games testers and speed runners.

Rory_Mcgillicudy_sucks
taseredbirdinstinct 写道:
sksshooter wrote:
taseredbirdinstinct 写道:
sksshooter wrote:

e.g. copycat opening

 

 

The classic 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 3.Nxe4 is a called the Damiano classical variation and after 4.Qe2 there is actually combination black can employ to win back all material after the queen takes, it was demonstrared during the 1400's by Damiano along while ago. I'm not 100% sure how to perform although if you were to go through and check through it you would be able to see that black can win back all material.

It's a classic, well known line within the Petrov. Not bad at all.

since black is down a queen,there is no any way to win .i said all game copycat.

i know petrov is exelent,i often play it.

You're doing it completely wrong, take another look.

 

i said copycat.this is defenitly not copycat

taseredbirdinstinct
sksshooter wrote:
taseredbirdinstinct 写道:
sksshooter wrote:
taseredbirdinstinct 写道:
sksshooter wrote:

e.g. copycat opening

 

 

The classic 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 3.Nxe4 is a called the Damiano classical variation and after 4.Qe2 there is actually combination black can employ to win back all material after the queen takes, it was demonstrared during the 1400's by Damiano along while ago. I'm not 100% sure how to perform although if you were to go through and check through it you would be able to see that black can win back all material.

It's a classic, well known line within the Petrov. Not bad at all.

since black is down a queen,there is no any way to win .i said all game copycat.

i know petrov is exelent,i often play it.

You're doing it completely wrong, take another look.

 

i said copycat.this is defenitly not copycat

Copy cat does actually work up to a point, although in pretty much every game black eventually has to try to break symmetry, there might be the occassional game won by black through copy cat means, although it is probably extremely rare for it to happen. Copy cat is very unreliable in the face of tactics, certainly impossible once black gets the king checked, unless there happens to be a way to restore symmetry, which might occassionally happen.