I'm 1000 again

Sort:
Ilampozhil25

i literally missed a backwards knight move

*sigh*

RobertJames_Fisher
Ilampozhil25 wrote:

unsure if you mean blunder in a different sense than i do

yes, i do blunder but what does "frequent" mean?

 

That is a good question. Well one blunder can cost us a match. I too blunder but it also depends on the severity of the blunder.  I am in the same boat, I think my biggest issue is when you check the "accuracy" rating at the end of the match, what is your "accuracy" number that seems like the biggest issue for most of us

 

Ilampozhil25

i rly dont take much from accuracy

i just look at moves which are blunders

 

RobertJames_Fisher

Not trying to be a wise guy but why not?

Ilampozhil25

its not accurate

ask thrillerfan he'll explain it better than me

while, since i blunder a lot, i look at those cuz they are accurate

usually most of them i had spotted JUST after the move

CastawayWill

I'm an 1100, feel free to analyze my games and learn from them.

ninjaswat
CastawayWill wrote:

I'm an 1100, feel free to analyze my games and learn from them.

Difference between 1000s and 1100s is you don't bounded as much... At least that's all I remember when climbing

RobertJames_Fisher

the issue with the analysis, is it does not tell you WHY the moves it bad (if not obvious), so it does not help your thinking process

 

Don
CastawayWill wrote:

I'm an 1100, feel free to analyze my games and learn from them.

First of all, at 1000 they should not analyze any games except their own.

Second of all, if they are going to analyze other's games they should study grandmaster games.

Third of all, studying your games won't help them.

Don
millerd66 wrote:

the issue with the analysis, is it does not tell you WHY the moves it bad (if not obvious), so it does not help your thinking process

 

It tells you what the other side can play to take advantage of your mistake, and it tells you what you should've played. That usually explains it all.

RobertJames_Fisher
DonRajesh wrote:
millerd66 wrote:

the issue with the analysis, is it does not tell you WHY the moves it bad (if not obvious), so it does not help your thinking process

 

It tells you what the other side can play to take advantage of your mistake, and it tells you what you should've played. That usually explains it all.

 

In some cases it is not as obvious especially in the beginning, and if you are just learning perhaps you don't know why because it is a subtle move which in the short run does not mean much but when you see that point meter move, you are like but why

 

Clint20

I'm a beginner who just eclipsed 1000 today! Small achievements, but progression nevertheless.

Don
Clint20 wrote:

I'm a beginner who just eclipsed 1000 today! Small achievements, but progression nevertheless.

Nice!

RobertJames_Fisher

Reaching 1000 to me would feel like I am Robert James Fischer

moxnixblitz

Playing everyday seems to be the best way to improve I just started playing blitz and I'm gaining points fairly quick.  It really does feel like the "just don't blunder" game mode as ill often be 5-6 ahead in computer analysis then just straight hang my queen or something as soon as I start worrying about the clock.  It can also be really frustrating to play vs someone else who blunders and win in 20 moves with 90+ accuracy then somehow with the same opening the next game get 20% accuracy blunder 4 times and get dumpstered in a similar number of moves.  I want to push for 1000 soon but I've only really been playing blitz one week despite that I don't think it will be so hard based off the fact that almost every game I lose I'm hanging full pieces and I normally realize I've blundered before they even move.  the number of times I've realized I just gave away a free queen .1 seconds after moving is real.  

AngryNaartjie
Ilampozhil25 wrote:

what?

100-999 has THREE digits in each number, making you a... Three-Digit Hero!
1000-Magnus has FOUR digits in each number, making you a... FOUR-DIGIT LEGEND!

Ilampozhil25

WHY HERO AND LEGEND?

AngryNaartjie
Ilampozhil25 wrote:

WHY HERO AND LEGEND?

Hero is mostly because in Starcraft, where the lowest league is Bronze. A player in that league is called a Bronze League Heroes. And why Legend? Mostly because "Why not?" 

You are welcome to use any other name that works for you.

Blackhole_Chess
nousernameswereavailable wrote:

@DonRajesh you definitely can get to 2000 by the end of this year.

i gained nearly 200 elo in 5 hours

Like I gained 400 points in 14 days

Ilampozhil25

thats a lot