Is 600 good?

Sorry to break it to you but 600 is just barely above the average chess.com rating. The good news is that it doesn't matter! Neither does some objective adjective like "good" or "great", or what anyone else thinks of your playing ability.

600 is the average rating here on chess.com

AFAICS the important ratings are 1000 and 2000.

With 1000 you have really started to understand the game, dont blunder all the time anymore, and are ready for more advanced things like playing faster time controls and learning openings.

With 2000 you are usually playing blunder free games and are able to punish more subtle errors, and are basically good enough to try OTB.

#4 Average rating in live gamemodes is closer to 500

I mean I'm 60 percentile in bullet and I'm only like 600-ish

Blunder free games is stretching it, punishing subtle errors is questionable to say the least.

I’m sure 90% of 2000’s agrees with me here

600 is about the level hikaru is playing in the candidates, so yes it's pretty good

111

Don't think about it, just try to improve yourself everyday, 50 rating at a time, you'll be 1000 in no time

Yes.

You have reached the level of the average chess.com member, give or take a few points.

So you've caught up to the pack, and can start thinking about pulling ahead.

I blunder in pretty well every game I play.

It's just that the blunders get less obvious at high level.

#14 Why are you copy and pasting 'Intresting' everywhere