My tennis rating relative to the tennis playing population is comparable with a < 1000 rating on chess.com, I think. And I'm stuck at that rating for about 25 years. Is that also cruel and deceitful? Should I stop playing?
Would you be a chess player, I would say you're a mentally disabled person.
What is cruel and deceitfull, is to flatter and let believe someone stuck at such sub level, they're anything or anyone worth mentioning or counting, within the said sport.
Even low IQ and uneducated persons get easily to 1000 and above after a year, at most two, club/competition practice and study.
As you can see, nobody, beside nervously or mentally disabled persons, stays long under 1300, under which you're the complete beginner. Even blind players get rated higher than 1300 rather quickly.
So, if you want to know, if it means something to play at such sub level a thing that is not only a game but also a sport and somehow a martial art, my answer, based on good old common sense, is: no. Go play golf, or dominos, chess doesn't suit your temper, your personality, something such.
If you insist on playing chess anyway, well, sure, be free. But don't bother then "levels", "ratings" and the such, for there is no such thing for Monopoly or Cluedo players. For you're then playing some sort of chess with dices, instead of playing the actual art of chess.
haha poor guy...