Low Rated Good Players
Your moves 13-15 were just plain bad.
I know, it is not the issue I am pointing. My point is It feels like time and games in chess.com is more predictive than rate

But they're a real bummer when you just want to vent.
I'll sympathize with you though. Lower-level players regularly outplay their ELO by a lot.
I'm not really sure why, but it makes it more difficult to improve with regular play than I think it should be. 😕
It's possible that some lower-level players use assistance on critical moves. If they only use assistance for a few moves per game, there's no way for moderation to detect/prove that they're using unfair tactics. 🤷♂️
Hi. I had a game with a player rated around 800
His game was very good, and it seems like he had a real plan for the game and not just short term tactics until someone blunders that beginners (like me of course) usually have.
Checking his profile, he already played more than 6 thousands game.
And his current rate is much lower than his highest which was around 1300, and he was 1000+ consistently for around 10 years. But in the last few month he had a sudden drop of around 400 hundreds of rate points
Is the rating system actually means no much ? How can it possibly be ?