Please help!!


i disagree about the playing once or twice a day/every 2 days part. You'll only get better at stuff if you actually are put into a real game, even if its against the computer, but more preferably a human. you can do puzzles all day but once you play actual games if you don't have experience seeing all kinds of positions and seeing the whole game (opening, mid, endgame), you won't improve. I'm not high rank by any means, but I got better once I stopped pushing off actually playing and balanced it with studying/doing puzzles.
I will say analysis is huge though, and that part of the blog is spot on. I am gold tier member and the embedded analysis tools that you can use right after a game/sometime in the future is really really helpful. after enough analysis, you start to notice trends in your play and can identify the weak spots. Then you can make your puzzles/practice/learning more meaningful by focusing on your weak spots.

@grachi365
It is much more important to play long time controls than to play a lot of blitz games. Of course, if you have the time to play every day 1 hour per side games and still do other things from the post and more, I applaud that, but that would require a lot of dedication. Because if you want to improve just by playing games, you will not improve optimally, as you are missing out on some important things. Just as a basketball player will not improve just by playing games, but by training as well.
3 games a week is certainly enough for a steady progress, I said that in a blog because it worked for me so far (for a few months of playing chess, from 800 to 1 500 is ok improvement, I actually didn't expect to hit 1 500 this year, I would be ok if I did it by the end of next year), and not only that, but many other people who are way ahead of me said that as well. For instance IM Kostya Kavutskiy said that one game per week or 1 game in 2 weeks is enough (provided that when you play it nothing is more important, and it is longer time control), but he is an IM, so he has a lot of experience in the first place and it might be correct for him. Stjepan Tomic, Hanging pawns on youtube, said it as well, and he is over 1900 FIDE. It is true that we should play games to progress, but to optimize, playing games shouldn't be the only thing to do. If you add all things I've mentioned in that post, with games every other day, it could still be a lot of time spend on chess. Some people can spend only a fraction of that time, some can do a lot more. But anyway, there is no rush. You do not have to rack up thousands of games quickly. By playing less you will still play a lot of games after a long period of time and you will have steady improvement.
The post should be used as a broad guide, because beginners can be overwhelmed when starting out. If a person can do more, that is great.

You're welcome. Just have in mind that this is not a quick fix, and losing is just a part of the game. Don't get discouraged by losses, your game will improve in time.