ratings and delusions

Sort:
Avatar of necromancerKing2304
people just think the more high rating the more the smart person is but it's wrong if you make a small trick on your own you can easily defeat players upto 1000 rating after that it's difficult by tricks but till the time you reach 1000 with tricks or same gameplays or whatever you had reached the mindset or things which are nessecasary to make you better player so just start and don't think about rating after you make a trick with just the same trick you can win watches in a row .
Avatar of Josh11live
Yep
Avatar of Savedbygrace2

Why is my rating 800 and sometimes it's right i look when I played bots it's at 800 but im at 1190

Avatar of finthesaiyan
Avatar of delcai007

Bot ratings, and the rating given by Game Review's rating estimate, should not be taken seriously. Even Artificial Intelligence needs much more than a single game to determine how skilled you are. Knowing the results would be inaccurate, developers (correctly) decided to make sure the error would almost always be on the side of being generous... better to flatter than to discourage.

"You say I played like a 2000?"

Avatar of Savedbygrace2

Thank you

Avatar of delcai007
necromancerKing2304 wrote:
people just think the more high rating the more the smart person is but it's wrong 

No one in their right mind would suggest chess is an IQ test. Intelligence is a factor. How could it not be? But it's not the only factor or the most important one: experience is, by far. Also important is motivation/interest/enthusiasm. The other day, an IM said, "Look at your rating compared to mine." I said, "Well, I'm pretty sure you're not 2 1/2 times as smart as me, else I have some serious life questions for ya'. Besides, I aced my college SAT's, every subject. How about you?".