Some things I have learned

Sort:
crocodilestyle1

I used to play chess a long time ago, and with the last few years I have been trying to get back to it - let me try and lay out a few mistakes and a few things I have learned. I am not an instructor, but I hope I can give some ideas.

Most important: Fun. When I was about 15, suddenly out of nowhere I could beat just about anyone at chess, I had never studied, and even when I was at uni I could beat club players. 2 DECADES later when I cam back to the game, I expected it to be the same, and it was not and I was not - so I got frustrated and angry, I thought any player I could not beat was cheating and any chess puzzle I could not solve instantly was incorrect. Consequently for most of the last few years I did not improve. After watching a few vids by a chess youtuber, he changed my attitude, and now I enjoy the game more, I find that I am actually improving. I don't think you can improve at any skill when you are fighting against it.

Structure: I play guitar, and for although I have been in bands for a long time my guitar playing stayed at the same standard for a LONG time. That changed when I created a practice routine - scales, technical exercises, creative exercises, jamming, songs. Chess is similar, there are many aspects to work on - I created a routine, tactical puzzles, openings, end games, evaluation, master games. It has helped me - I would advise people to do the same.

Find a book to follow through, maybe read at bedtime!? Currently I have a book called Mayhem in the Morra by Marc Esserman, to be honest it might be a bit above my level, but the guy is hugely enthusiastic and expresses his ideas really well. So I might not be playing the Morra Gambit, but in the book he talks about the how simple moves effect the game - moving the pawn here opens this line, or this pawn move creates a weakness; and thinking about how each move's long term effects is very informative.

crocodilestyle1

@TheNameofNames It is interesting that you mention Silman, I have heard a lot of good things about his books - and I have actually watched some vids by him he is a very good teacher. I have a great deal of fondness for people like him who seem to be really dedicated to giving a lot back to the game.

I think I was unbeatable for about 18 months! But I agree with what you say, chess is such a great game, and enjoying it is a huge part - and enjoyment is not just winning!

Your last point is key too - I just felt like the right moves should come to me naturally, so I though in 3 minute blitz I would just win every game - just like the GMs and IMs you see on YT or twitch. But playing longer format, and actually applying what I learn,p I find my results are better and maybe in a few years I will go back to blitz....or at least in the mean time be realistic about my expectations in quick time controls.

crocodilestyle1
TheNameofNames wrote:

I hate blitz but to each his his own i guess 

One of the joys of the game really - you can really like a game with no clocks and maybe take 3 or 4 hours, and then the next person you speak to who loves chess as much as you plays 1 minute bullet and has never had a game last more than 3 minutes!

I love looking at the nicely carved pieces of a real chess set - there are probably tens of thousands of people far far better than me at chess who have only ever played on a computer screen.

Another thing I love is that you will find online people who have been playing for 2 days wishing to share their love for the game, and what they have learned....and you'll find people who have been playing for 70 years doing the same. Chess players are good people, it is a love of learning*.

*Sorry for the slightly overwrought comment, I've had a bit of a bad day, but I am always hearted by the good advice and conversations people share on this site.