@1
"I’m at a 820 right now."++ Then your main concern should be to always check your intended move is no blunder before uou play it.
Hang no pieces, hang no pawns. When your opponent hangs a piece or a pawn, take it.
"regarding openings is how circumstantial they are."
++ Do not worry about openings. Just develop pieces into play and play for the center.
You will not win or lose because of the opening, but because of tactical mistakes.
"2-4 moves the opponent has to make in order for that opening to take place."
++ Frequently played sequences got names for easy reference. Nobody must play that way.
"How does one use named openings" ++ You cannot. You depend on the moves of your opponent. Do not worry about openings. Develop pieces into play and play for the center.
"what aspects of the game to focus on" ++ Blunder prevention, then tactics, then endgames.
"Is picking a couple white and black openings and practicing them a good move?"
++ Yes, in descending order: a defence against 1 e4, a defence against 1 d4, a white opening.
Recommended are 1 e4 e5 and 1 d4 d5 as black and 1 e4 as white.
So I’ve played a fair bit of chess, but never with any sort of strategy or training. I’m at a 820 right now.
I’d like to start to think more strategically and just play better overall.
A question I’ve always had regarding openings is how circumstantial they are. I feel like whenever I look up an opening, it’s predicated on like 2-4 moves the opponent has to make in order for that opening to take place. How does one use named openings routinely if the odds of the opponent doing the necessary moves are so low?
Another question I’ve had is what aspects of the game to focus on if the aim you’ve put for yourself is to simply be able to consistently beat a total beginner. Is picking a couple white and black openings and practicing them a good move?
Thanks in advance a lot!