stuck at 100 rating

Sort:
AunTheKnight
nTzT wrote:

From your games it looks like you are losing on purpose. Not sure if that's actually the case.... if you are in fact not trolling then you need to stop playing speed chess entirely and do some basic lessons and courses that you can find.

It actually does now! Hm. Strange.

Bruno5979

why are you playing at full speed and in a 10 minute game you have already played 13 moves in 20 seconds ???
you have to think before playing otherwise you can't learn!
Already drop the bullets and the blitz it is clearly not for beginners.

play at least 10 minutes, but normally you shouldn't have time to play 30 moves, so 20 or 30 minutes.

It's not enough to make a move, you also have to put yourself in your opponent's shoes and see if they can take a coin from you.

itsthenixx
Nennerb wrote:

You can just say they instead of (s)he

Does it bother you? Also, forgive me if I am grammatically incorrect but I am pretty sure they is plural. English is my second language so don't criticise me

AunTheKnight
toxic_rabbit wrote:
Nennerb wrote:

You can just say they instead of (s)he

Does it bother you? Also, forgive me if I am grammatically incorrect but I am pretty sure they is plural. English is my second language so don't criticise me

No, you're correct.

Bruno5979

 

as much for me I did not watch your last game 10 'that you won. I looked at your last 10 'lost which was catastrophic.

you played much better that's good! Keep it up and never be 100 again.

Nennerb
AunTheKnight wrote:
Nennerb wrote:

You can just say they instead of (s)he

That would be grammatically incorrect. 

Of course, "has" would have to be turned into "have" to be grammatically correct: "Like, I am pretty sure they have hung their queen in every game that I have looked at so far.

You can also say (s)he, but why complicate things with special characters when you can say "they."

As provided by APA, "they" may also be used in the singular tense.
https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/singular-they#:~:text=The%20singular%20%E2%80%9Cthey%E2%80%9D%20is%20a,ze%E2%80%9D%20or%20%E2%80%9Chen.%E2%80%9D&text=A%20person%20should%20enjoy%20his%20or%20her%20vacation.

Nennerb

Of course, grammar is of no importance anyway on informal forums like this.

MARattigan

Bejabers, how low can a man get?

JackRoach

Don't play super fast.

Play rapid.

JogoReal

Fortunately he is not demanding a GM title for tomorrow, like some here.

nTzT

Unfollowing this one, pretty convinced it's just a troll.

MARattigan
Nennerb wrote:

You can just say they instead of (s)he

You can just say "he" if its referring to "this guy". If nothing indicates the sex of the subject you can just say "he" anyway. Sod political correctness.

beesmastajoe
In my opinion, he/she are either trolling or trying to get attention
laurengoodkindchess

Hi! My name is Lauren Goodkind and I’m a chess coach based and chess book author based in California. 

Sorry to hear that you are losing a lot of games!  

I have tips to help you improve your chess skills so you can win more games.  

-I  offer a  free beginner’s free eBook on my website, www.ChessByLauren.com in case you are interested. The book is about asking questions before each move.  

-Learn basic tactics such as the fork, discovered attack, pin, and more.  I offer interactive puzzles on my website: https://www.chessbylauren.com/two-choice-puzzles.php  

-I recommend two books for you: “50 Poison Pieces”   and “Queen For A Day: The Girl’s Guide To Chess Mastery.”  Both books are available on Amazon.com.  Both books are endorsed by chess masters!  

-If you are serious about chess, I highly recommend you hiring a chess coach to help you.  

I hope that this helps.  

oevs

Watch John Bartholomew videos on Youtube - Chess Fundamentals. It's great for beginners

AvianMind

Lol if you look through his games, it's clearly a troll.

JackRoach
Viznik wrote:
My advice would be to learn “Scholar Mate”. This will not only help you get out of 100 ELO hell, but it will also teach you some great fundamentals about opening ideas, positioning, and attacking!

At your rating, I wouldn’t worry about anything else except trying to master the Scholars Mate. Believe it or not, I was in your shoes just a few months ago. My rating was 198! Don’t listen to people saying to quit; it’s very easy to beat somebody who doesn’t know anything about chess ... and that’s all you’re running into.

Think positively. It’s much better to be in your shoes at 100 ELO than at a 400-500 ELO that knows a lot about chess but is struggling.

The chess world is your oyster at this point! Learn the scholars mate, and play it every game until you’ve mastered it. Then, move on to something a little more advanced like the London system and try to master that. Next thing you know, you’ll be closing in on 1000!

Don't do scholars mate. 

 

Ok, listen, I think we had this discussion before. Scholars mate helps them gain rating, yes, but it doesn't help them improve. If they fail achieving it, then they're worse and will probably lose. (You never know with beginner games, but yeah.) 

Meanwhile, their rating will get inflated, and after Scholar's Mate doesn't work, they will be destroyed. They won't learn anything.

AunTheKnight
Viznik wrote:
I disagree Jack. For me, scholars mate was the first and only thing that could make me understand positioning and where all my pieces on the board are. I stopped playing it around 400 ELO, but without I don’t know if I make the same improvements

Scholar's Mate may be a short-term improvement in rating. but there are few, if any, long-term benefits. But to each their own, I guess.

JackRoach
Viznik wrote:
I disagree Jack. For me, scholars mate was the first and only thing that could make me understand positioning and where all my pieces on the board are. I stopped playing it around 400 ELO, but without I don’t know if I make the same improvements

It's not the same for everyone though.

 

asdfghkl123456798

just checked one  of your games and it looks like yor trying to lose