Forums

When to resign - Etiquette - An honest appeal

Sort:
Avatar of angrypotato33
angrypotato33
Nov 29, 2020
0
#301

You suck it up and try and figure it out

Avatar of wornaki
wornaki
Nov 29, 2020
0
#302
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
wornaki wrote:

What I'm trying to say by bringing up Giri vs Xiong is that it was an obvious draw at that level. In fact, it was an obvious draw at typical master level (forget about whether. G, I, F or even C or N master level). What did Giri willingly do? Play unnecessary moves and then agree to a draw a couple of moves before it was going to be called anyway.

That's bad manners, right there, in OTB chess, at GM level, in an official tournament. The same crappy attitude.

Bruh listen , I am not being rude but I don't think so you have the ability yet to evaluate the games of super GMs and tell that a position was certainly draw and the moves made further were unnecessary.

Listen, bruh. I did not come up with that. The game was commented on by several GMs, IMs and even FMs to the same conclusion.

Avatar of Anonymous_Dragon
Anonymous_Dragon
Nov 29, 2020
0
#303
wornaki wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
wornaki wrote:

What I'm trying to say by bringing up Giri vs Xiong is that it was an obvious draw at that level. In fact, it was an obvious draw at typical master level (forget about whether. G, I, F or even C or N master level). What did Giri willingly do? Play unnecessary moves and then agree to a draw a couple of moves before it was going to be called anyway.

That's bad manners, right there, in OTB chess, at GM level, in an official tournament. The same crappy attitude.

Bruh listen , I am not being rude but I don't think so you have the ability yet to evaluate the games of super GMs and tell that a position was certainly draw and the moves made further were unnecessary.

Listen, bruh. I did not come up with that. The game was commented on by several GMs, IMs and even FMs to the same conclusion.

So neither are they qualified enough to comment on GMs games unless they are looking up an engine. Secondly both of them had their Queens and five or 6 pawns on board. So how the heck is that a draw ? Any side can win if they build up pressure ? Why call it a draw ? Is it because both of them had equal material ? Then why not declare all games draw at the very beginning of the match ?

Avatar of EminemTheMonster
EminemTheMonster
Nov 29, 2020
0
#304

which Giri vs Xiong game?

Avatar of PleasantEscalator
PleasantEscalator
Nov 29, 2020
0
#305
wornaki wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
wornaki wrote:

What I'm trying to say by bringing up Giri vs Xiong is that it was an obvious draw at that level. In fact, it was an obvious draw at typical master level (forget about whether. G, I, F or even C or N master level). What did Giri willingly do? Play unnecessary moves and then agree to a draw a couple of moves before it was going to be called anyway.

That's bad manners, right there, in OTB chess, at GM level, in an official tournament. The same crappy attitude.

Bruh listen , I am not being rude but I don't think so you have the ability yet to evaluate the games of super GMs and tell that a position was certainly draw and the moves made further were unnecessary.

Listen, bruh. I did not come up with that. The game was commented on by several GMs, IMs and even FMs to the same conclusion.

Nice u have no clue how to use bruh smh 😑

Avatar of EminemTheMonster
EminemTheMonster
Nov 29, 2020
0
#306
StressFreaksMeOut wrote:
wornaki wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
wornaki wrote:

What I'm trying to say by bringing up Giri vs Xiong is that it was an obvious draw at that level. In fact, it was an obvious draw at typical master level (forget about whether. G, I, F or even C or N master level). What did Giri willingly do? Play unnecessary moves and then agree to a draw a couple of moves before it was going to be called anyway.

That's bad manners, right there, in OTB chess, at GM level, in an official tournament. The same crappy attitude.

Bruh listen , I am not being rude but I don't think so you have the ability yet to evaluate the games of super GMs and tell that a position was certainly draw and the moves made further were unnecessary.

Listen, bruh. I did not come up with that. The game was commented on by several GMs, IMs and even FMs to the same conclusion.

Nice u have no clue how to use bruh smh 😑

bruh

Avatar of PleasantEscalator
PleasantEscalator
Nov 29, 2020
0
#307

lmfao

Avatar of wornaki
wornaki
Nov 29, 2020
0
#308

Back to topic, I have decided to test the idea that only beginner players play chess with obnoxious attitudes. After my daily games are over, I'll challenge people over 1600 in blitz and if they take me, I'll check how obnoxious they are. I'll report back at 25 games, if I get to them. Time control will be 3+0, so as to entice flagging and tricks and traps, for both rated and unrated games. We'll see. My hunch (and hypothesis) is that there will be little nonsense, but I'll test it.

Avatar of Anonymous_Dragon
Anonymous_Dragon
Nov 29, 2020
0
#309
wornaki wrote:

Back to topic, I have decided to test the idea that only beginner players play chess with obnoxious attitudes. After my daily games are over, I'll challenge people over 1600 in blitz and if they take me, I'll check how obnoxious they are. I'll report back at 25 games, if I get to them. Time control will be 3+0, so as to entice flagging and tricks and traps, for both rated and unrated games. We'll see. My hunch (and hypothesis) is that there will be little nonsense, but I'll test it.

if you play 1600s you obviously arent going to end up in a winning position ....how are you going to check how obnoxious they are ?

Avatar of PleasantEscalator
PleasantEscalator
Nov 29, 2020
0
#310
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
wornaki wrote:

Back to topic, I have decided to test the idea that only beginner players play chess with obnoxious attitudes. After my daily games are over, I'll challenge people over 1600 in blitz and if they take me, I'll check how obnoxious they are. I'll report back at 25 games, if I get to them. Time control will be 3+0, so as to entice flagging and tricks and traps, for both rated and unrated games. We'll see. My hunch (and hypothesis) is that there will be little nonsense, but I'll test it.

if you play 1600s you obviously arent going to end up in a winning position ....how are you going to check how obnoxious they are ?

Yea and they won’t accept ur challenge smh

Avatar of PleasantEscalator
PleasantEscalator
Nov 29, 2020
0
#311

Where’s ur iq

Avatar of EminemTheMonster
EminemTheMonster
Nov 29, 2020
0
#312
wornaki wrote:

Back to topic, I have decided to test the idea that only beginner players play chess with obnoxious attitudes. After my daily games are over, I'll challenge people over 1600 in blitz and if they take me, I'll check how obnoxious they are. I'll report back at 25 games, if I get to them. Time control will be 3+0, so as to entice flagging and tricks and traps, for both rated and unrated games. We'll see. My hunch (and hypothesis) is that there will be little nonsense, but I'll test it.

Because you won't end up in a winning position.

Also, how is playing on in a non-increment game "obnoxious"? 

Avatar of PleasantEscalator
PleasantEscalator
Nov 29, 2020
0
#313
EminemTheMonster wrote:
wornaki wrote:

Back to topic, I have decided to test the idea that only beginner players play chess with obnoxious attitudes. After my daily games are over, I'll challenge people over 1600 in blitz and if they take me, I'll check how obnoxious they are. I'll report back at 25 games, if I get to them. Time control will be 3+0, so as to entice flagging and tricks and traps, for both rated and unrated games. We'll see. My hunch (and hypothesis) is that there will be little nonsense, but I'll test it.

Because you won't end up in a winning position.

Also, how is playing on in a non-increment game "obnoxious"? 

Ikr

Avatar of wornaki
wornaki
Nov 29, 2020
0
#314

If they play for traps and tricks, they qualify as obnoxious, especially if the tricks and traps are meant for beginners. If they go for flagging, they qualify as obnoxious. 

Avatar of EminemTheMonster
EminemTheMonster
Nov 29, 2020
0
#315
wornaki wrote:

If they play for traps and tricks, they qualify as obnoxious, especially if the tricks and traps are meant for beginners. If they go for flagging, they qualify as obnoxious. 

Damn. I'm really obnoxious.

Avatar of PleasantEscalator
PleasantEscalator
Nov 29, 2020
0
#316
wornaki wrote:

If they play for traps and tricks, they qualify as obnoxious, especially if the tricks and traps are meant for beginners. If they go for flagging, they qualify as obnoxious. 

Uh what’s wrong with playing traps and tricks 

Avatar of Anonymous_Dragon
Anonymous_Dragon
Nov 29, 2020
0
#317
wornaki wrote:

If they play for traps and tricks, they qualify as obnoxious, especially if the tricks and traps are meant for beginners. If they go for flagging, they qualify as obnoxious. 

lol bruh why will they even have the need to flag when they can crush you ? and there's nothing wrong if they go for tricks and traps....coz those are meant for people like you.

Avatar of wornaki
wornaki
Nov 29, 2020
0
#318

Also, we'll see if they accept my challenges. Probably many will not, but that's fine. I do this just for the sake of my own curiosity. 

Avatar of wornaki
wornaki
Nov 29, 2020
0
#319
EminemTheMonster wrote:
wornaki wrote:

If they play for traps and tricks, they qualify as obnoxious, especially if the tricks and traps are meant for beginners. If they go for flagging, they qualify as obnoxious. 

Damn. I'm really obnoxious.

Well, it's nice to know. Some people can't accept it. Kudos for being able to do so.

Avatar of EminemTheMonster
EminemTheMonster
Nov 29, 2020
0
#320
wornaki wrote:

Also, we'll see if they accept my challenges. Probably many will not, but that's fine. I do this just for the sake of my own curiosity. 

I love how you want to play stronger players to judge how obnoxious they are, rather than to improve.