So I have been all over the place as a chess player. After some lucky wins early on after joining this site I dropped down to as low as 640. From there playing on and off I slowly climbed to my current rating band where I swing from 930 to 960, though I did taste a round 1000 for 1 game. I really want to break regularly into the 1000s rating band on a permanent basis. Not due to any real love of ratings but more as a measure of personal improvement.
I'm doing this by getting a membership, working through all the new lessons, doing a 20-30 tactics puzzles a day and anaylsing every game with the chess.com analysis engine to see my errors and replaying the error moves to try and learn the best result. I don't have access to a chess coach or more skilled friend to teach me. Does this sound good?
At this rating band, am I better served by say only playing a couple openings so I can get clearer feedback about what I'm doing wrong? Or would it be better to keep doing what I'm doing but try to play many kinds of openings so I develop a better instinct for not hanging pieces? When I do play games I've been playing 10 minute blitz games. They seem slow enough that I have some time for thinking but fast enough I feel like I can experience many games.
Any thoughts? General advice? Is it a waste of time using engines? Can I achieve my dream of maybe one day reaching 2000 rating online if I do this consistently?
I looked at one of your games and was very puzzled.
Please explain 20 Bxh6 and 22 Rxh6.
You had plenty of time. You were about to lose a pawn. Why was that so hard to accept?
If you say you just miscalculated, I would suggest you play Puzzle Rush 50 times a day. You don't need advanced puzzles You need to learn to calculate basic tactics.
So I have been all over the place as a chess player. After some lucky wins early on after joining this site I dropped down to as low as 640. From there playing on and off I slowly climbed to my current rating band where I swing from 930 to 960, though I did taste a round 1000 for 1 game. I really want to break regularly into the 1000s rating band on a permanent basis. Not due to any real love of ratings but more as a measure of personal improvement.
I'm doing this by getting a membership, working through all the new lessons, doing a 20-30 tactics puzzles a day and anaylsing every game with the chess.com analysis engine to see my errors and replaying the error moves to try and learn the best result. I don't have access to a chess coach or more skilled friend to teach me. Does this sound good?
At this rating band, am I better served by say only playing a couple openings so I can get clearer feedback about what I'm doing wrong? Or would it be better to keep doing what I'm doing but try to play many kinds of openings so I develop a better instinct for not hanging pieces? When I do play games I've been playing 10 minute blitz games. They seem slow enough that I have some time for thinking but fast enough I feel like I can experience many games.
Any thoughts? General advice? Is it a waste of time using engines? Can I achieve my dream of maybe one day reaching 2000 rating online if I do this consistently?