Right... the treacherousness of chess, or the liabilities of being a patzer (true for all levels), or whatever... :-)
CP6033 vs. solskytz
I assume you're talking about game 2 CP, we're discussing 1 of the sub variations you each included in your analysis. You both give nxc5 after qxf5 but nf6+ wins the queen.
Ah true enough-I was looking at the wrong variation. Nxc5 does still win, but Nf6+ is much cleaner and clearer obviously.
I've been busy, and in addition CP6033 has became a SCARY player since we first met - so I really need some preparation before playing him again...
Such as - getting some decent progress on my CALCULATE TILL MATE course by GM SMIRNOFF
Good news: As of Tuesday night, we are renewing the match. CP needs some "sharpening up" before going to a major tourney in May...
Game scheduled to 23:00 hours , GMT (which is 01:00 here in Belgium, and 19:00 in Canada)
CP6033: 4.5
Solskytz: 1.5 and a third straight loss!
Here's the game, with some annotations, mostly what I thought about during the game and what came up in post-mortem
His ...h6 was brilliant and asked me to show understanding. Instead of keeping the game tense with g6, I simplified into an ending - and he saw deeper into it than I did. Well done Caleb!
We just finished our 6th game of the match, and we're 1/4 of the way through! Currently the match score is 4.5-1.5 for me.
Here's just the game-I'll try to add annotation soon.
Wow!! I didn't realize that Re3 was the losing mistake, and that I still had chances with my R on b3. Very revealing!
I looked at these two pawns as pretty formidable, and didn't think that my K alone could handle them both, together with the black rook. I just didn't see this resource - thanks for pointing it out!
You know, last time we played, when you won that R + B (of difference color) endgame when I was still in Mexico, and explained to me all about exchanging one pair of rooks and pressing - the following day I beat a strong player in the club with that exact same idea, in the exact same type of position (although against you it came from a Petroff, and against him I was white and started with 1. d4).
I thought about it, and maybe, just maybe, if you play Ke3 I can go Rg3!? Kxe4 f2 and and get a queen vs a rook......you don't have to play Kxe4 of course, but then the threat is f2+, so you have to move the rook somewhere (let's say b6 and then I only have to stop your rook from getting on the f file, and I can play Re2 Kxe4 f2 and win......It's a bit dangerous-it gets complicated, but it might just work.
That tends to happen when players are focused on the positional implications of a variation. I know when I've been having a look at binds and try to play one in my own game and tie my opponent in knots with positional play I occasionally get my head taken clean off by a tactical shot. Lol