Illegal Position Contest!

Sort:
n9531l1

Think about it a little longer.

Ilampozhil25

i still dont get it

n9531l1

The correct answer is, none of them. All four pawns are needed to make the position illegal.

Ilampozhil25

wait what

the king triangulates
:facepalm

 

Ilampozhil25

better example

cuz then blacks previous moves are clear

n9531l1

Here's another that also starts from an easy legal position.

 

EvinSung

 

Ilampozhil25

white has 5 pieces left and 7 promoted pawns

black has 5 pieces left and 5 promoted pawns

 

EvinSung

what is the proof?

Ilampozhil25

just stating facts

i think too many captures

EvinSung

nope

n9531l1
Ilampozhil25 wrote:

just stating facts

i think too many captures

I think EvinSung is pulling your leg. You won't be able to give an illegality proof, because the position is legal.

 

EvinSung

thanks for telling me!

EvinSung

 

eric0022
EvinSung wrote:

 

 

Wow, the swapped positions of the knight and the rook made the position illegal.

Ilampozhil25

yeah

nf6-g8 is ruled out

if no swap-

 

OrphanGenerator
EvinSung wrote:

 

stop the spam man

KMMCS88
epicusernamehere wrote:
EvinSung wrote:

 

stop the spam man

He's not spamming; he's only put in one blatant position.

Ilampozhil25

example of spam-

this is legal

n9531l1
EvinSung wrote:

[#5042]

Another legal position in the Illegal Position thread.