It does save into the PNG.
Closest Time Scramble Possible?

Timestamps are not appearing (even the though the posted pgn has "show timestamps" ticked). The info can be clicked for evidence though, but yeah
0:00.1 on clock for the win with 0:00.2 for the opponent the move just before losing on time.
Time scrambles are crazy stuff - been on both sides too many times to count.

It does save into the PNG.
Okay thanks, I'll use this for next time I'm Black. If I need to change the pgn for this game, I'll repost from the Black side.

ahh yes.. the classic 0.001 that I had when I had mate in 1 premoved as a 2199.
Hey, I remember that!


and for the sake of fun, there was a mate in 2 earlier (when you both had your rooks) but maybe you know that already! Thx for the endgame post monn!

and for the sake of fun, there was a mate in 2 earlier (when you both had your rooks) but maybe you know that already! Thx for the endgame post monn!
Yes, thank you for the analysis: I really do appreciate it. I did know about the mate in 2 and yes I did analyze the Rook endgame as soon as the game finished (pretty obvious under long time controls to get the Rook behind the pawn), but I was just moving super fast and premoving a lot in the endgame.
Apparently every single move counted a lot because 0:00.1 on the clock means anything longer would have lost on time

Black definately was in a winning position in this end game scenario!
True, I "saved" a game I was winning anyhow - however, I'm sure all of us have also lost similar situations on time as well.
To be fair to my opponent though, the Rook ending entered was probably drawn from an objective standpoint (around the time of the Queen trades) and both of us probably knew that. I only gained the advantage because of likewise time pressure they had and by them blundering by retreating their own Rook to the first rank (to sacrifice the Rook for the passed pawn).
I'll put this under Game Showcase instead of another section. I am by no means "showing" a great game, but Game Analysis does not seem appropriate (I know we both made mistakes and that the endgame where they gave up the Rook was theoretically winning for me if any side was) and "Fun With Chess" doesn't seem right either.
Here is the 10 min game with timestamps, but it is only the final position that matters. Keep in mind that the premoves in chess.com take one tenth of a second at minimum.
I had 0:00.1 seconds left and my opponent had 0:00.2 seconds left before they lost on time!
I've been on the losing end of similar time scrambles before (even ending with 0:00.1 seconds once or twice before), but is this the closest time scramble possible?
I almost feel bad in these time scramble situations, but at least I didn't swindle a win since I was probably the better side for most of the game (although the entering endgame was likely drawn).
Here is the game with timestamps for proof (not that anyone would make up such a time scramble anyway though).
p.s. I'm Black, but not sure how to post with the board flipped. I know the arrows for "Flip board" but I don't think it "saves" into the pgn?