Disgustingly Bad Players Who Only Attack

Sort:
llamonade2

This is my 2nd topic on this theme (but first with this account).

When I was new to chess I had no respect for players who just threw everything at your king and hoped for mate.

Well now I'm more experienced, and it's my turn to frustrate noobs by winning with a completely filthy attack.

In the game below I'm white, and my attack is hilariously bad (black has many defenses).

My attack also results in mate tongue.png

 

 

 

st0ckfish

lolol, check out this game I played tongue.png

 

Ziggy_Zugzwang

Come on folks let's get on the bandwagon against these attacking players :-) who only attack....Let's form the moral majority and march up to their homes tonight with lit torches and chase them out of their mountainside fortress !!!!

Chef-KOdAwAri
How could they not see 21. Qxf6. ?!
st0ckfish

Just saying.....what attack was very Marshall-esque (Lopez), so it wasn't very "original", so to speak. Also going to mention your opponent blundered VERY badly...defending h3 with Re3 was a must. Just curious...was this bullet? tongue.png

Numquam
KibiDangoman schreef:

That was a 3 min Blitz game from today. Your analysis is way off maybe take a look at the Marshall gambit again.

If you want to see pathetic blunders look at your boyfriends game.

 

 

He probably means 14.Re3 which is the correct move and also a refutation in some dubious Marshall variation. There are some differences since b5 isn't played and is a possibility to complicate it, because the bishop is on c4. It is a 'filthy' unsound attack.

nighteyes1234

 

st0ckfish
KibiDangoman wrote:

That was a 3 min Blitz game from today. Your analysis is way off maybe take a look at the Marshall gambit again.

If you want to see pathetic blunders look at your boyfriends game.

 

 

bruh, some of the ideas, i never said all of it

Oh, and i think that was kind of the point of the game, llama mentions it IS unsound

nighteyes1234
KibiDangoman wrote:

@nighteyes1234

 

That all you got? Should be easier to find a terrible game of mine. That one was pretty good. I did see Nc6, just too late...probably cause I was on autopilot.  I was upset with myself over missing Nc6 initially...big deal. Im not worried about playing white.

 

 

 

Holmium67

You posted about a challenge 2hrs ago. The OP hasn't been online in 7.

st0ckfish
KibiDangoman wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:

bruh, some of the ideas, i never said all of it

Oh, and i think that was kind of the point of the game, llama mentions it IS unsound

That guy is 1800 and never played on this level in his life so his words mean nothing.

The Marshall Gambit is a legit gambit and played on high level.

Every gambit has weakness of course so if the opponent plays perfect you are at disadvantage.

But I destroyed a 2300 rated player with it so why is a 1800 beginner even talking about something that is above his paygrade?

I play the Marshall myself ...I never said it was a bad opening. Mr. Ding plays it as well, with a lot of success.

Oh, and if we're talking about destroying 2300+ players, I have a plus score against a 2300+ FM in over the board blitz AND rapid chess happy.png ...we've played over 15 games, if you are wondering. ✌️

st0ckfish

Llama isn't online

...and Pushwood doesn't want to play you.

st0ckfish

Its 2 PM EST, most people aren't on chess.com at that time.

 

st0ckfish

well, you realize by doing this you are just welcoming more insults...

st0ckfish
KibiDangoman wrote:

I dont care.

I want everyone to see the kind of cowards they are.

Its really funny how they talk big and then run away immediately when challenged.

Well ...have fun

Numquam
KibiDangoman schreef:
1_a31-0 wrote:

bruh, some of the ideas, i never said all of it

Oh, and i think that was kind of the point of the game, llama mentions it IS unsound

That guy is 1800 and never played on this level in his life so his words mean nothing.

The Marshall Gambit is a legit gambit and played on high level.

Every gambit has weakness of course so if the opponent plays perfect you are at disadvantage.

But I destroyed a 2300 rated player with it so why is a 1800 beginner even talking about something that is above his paygrade?

You got to prove that your attack is sound. Just offending people just shows your lack of intelligence. You can't even read. I never said the Marshall was unsound, you just got to play the right lines as always. And any 3 minute games of 2.2k and below rated are filled with mistakes. You don't need to be a genius to spot those.

st0ckfish
KibiDangoman wrote:

All Im saying is that as 1800 you have no business calling anything unsound when you clearly dont know what you are talking about and have never reached that level in your life.

 

The Damiano Defense is unsound tongue.png

-- a lowly 2000

Numquam
KibiDangoman schreef:
Numquam wrote:

Just offending people just shows your lack of intelligence.

You can't even read.

I never said the Marshall was unsound

Clearly I cant read.

 

Lol, that just proves that you can't read. Sorry but this is just funny. Of course the attack in the game played is unsound which you would have known if you had read the previous sentence.

SpalTechX
Cool
st0ckfish

no, its not unsound. the only unsound move was the move before Re3 (or when it should have been played)