Forums

how was this 64% accuracy? I played well

Sort:
DenialOfNature

I don't what this is on about.. that bishop sac was the beginning of an attack. Maybe stockfish can't see the big picture

not exactly the same but this is like greek gift, opponent accepts the gift and becomes a target, game goes down fast.

sawdof
DenialOfNature wrote:

I don't what this is on about.. that bishop sac was the beginning of an attack. Maybe stockfish can't see the big picture

 

not exactly the same but this is like greek gift, opponent accepts the gift and becomes a target, game goes down fast.

it doesn't reward hope chess.

https://www.chess.com/article/view/passive-vs-basic-hope-chess

DenialOfNature
sawdof wrote:
DenialOfNature wrote:

I don't what this is on about.. that bishop sac was the beginning of an attack. Maybe stockfish can't see the big picture

 

not exactly the same but this is like greek gift, opponent accepts the gift and becomes a target, game goes down fast.

it doesn't reward hope chess.

https://www.chess.com/article/view/passive-vs-basic-hope-chess

I knew what hope chess is but still checked the article. I don't think i played hope chess I had a plan. not tactical but a positional.

Bishop sac prevented black from castling and pulled king into battlefield. My queen was in the middle.. Is this hope or a plan?

Elaborate how you categorized my game as hope chess

sawdof
DenialOfNature wrote:
sawdof wrote:
DenialOfNature wrote:

I don't what this is on about.. that bishop sac was the beginning of an attack. Maybe stockfish can't see the big picture

 

not exactly the same but this is like greek gift, opponent accepts the gift and becomes a target, game goes down fast.

it doesn't reward hope chess.

https://www.chess.com/article/view/passive-vs-basic-hope-chess

I knew what hope chess is but still checked the article. I don't think i played hope chess I had a plan. not tactical but a positional.

Bishop sac prevented black from castling and pulled king into battlefield. My queen was in the middle.. Is this hope or a plan?

Elaborate how you categorized my game as hope chess

Hope because it wasn't calculated. Black wins with reasonable play. The review should show you why.

DenialOfNature
sawdof wrote:

Hope because it wasn't calculated. Black wins with reasonable play. The review should show you why.

It wasn't being calculated doesn't necessarily mean it's a hope chess. It might not be the best but there is a positinal plan there.

This is not how you play hope chess

sawdof
DenialOfNature wrote:
sawdof wrote:

Hope because it wasn't calculated. Black wins with reasonable play. The review should show you why.

It wasn't being calculated doesn't necessarily mean it's a hope chess. It might not be the best but there is a positinal plan there.

This is not how you play hope chess

Beginning to understand your handle ...

Edit:

The bunny was blocked. Boohoo

Please contact for more services:

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/community/bunnys-boohoo-services

DenialOfNature

Game review shows it's bad idea bud it never says this was a hope chess.. but a poor plan.

It's you who claimed it and it's your job to eloborate and explain

DenialOfNature
sawdof wrote:
DenialOfNature wrote:
sawdof wrote:

Hope because it wasn't calculated. Black wins with reasonable play. The review should show you why.

It wasn't being calculated doesn't necessarily mean it's a hope chess. It might not be the best but there is a positinal plan there.

This is not how you play hope chess

Beginning to understand your handle ...

Oh thats how you gonna play.. ad hominem now. thought you were a decent person for a second.

magipi

It wasn't a bad sacrifice in practice. Maybe black is better with perfect play, but a human opponent in a blitz game can't really defend perfectly. I would rather play white.

On the other hand, you shouldn't expect Stockfish to like it.

blueemu

The sacrifice was suitable for Blitz.

In any longer format, it was simply unsound.

Tjaart_vd_Walt1

Nah i am agreeing with stockfish analysis that bishop sac was not the bets option..

DenialOfNature

I appreciate all your comments and ideas, as you expressed the meaning of them so i get it.

ps: after i blocked, seems like that bunny and its friends made a downvote attack to my comments. you lost your right to speak buddy, bring more bunnies.. hehe

Sobrukai

I don't understand the sacrifice. I didn't even review the game and I can already see the Ke8 is safe and white has very little.

AtleeDo

hell naw you plays as dumb as me so dont ask question

TheSonics
DenialOfNature wrote:

opponent accepts the gift and becomes a target, game goes down fast.

Sacrifice was kind of decent... I found this line without the engine, after turning it on, it shows White does has compensation for the piece, but not full compensation... You have to prove you can do something with it, and that your over extended e pawn is an asset and not a liability.

I have a feeling this pawn can be eliminated one way or another, with patience...

The reason your attack has some potential is because Black played c5 which is a positional blunder. It leaves the d5 square weak, which is a problem for the sketchy king in many lines

Khnemu_Nehep

Terrible game from both players.

Brain
Engine is always right. This was not a good move