I literally got 100% accuracy!!!!

Sort:
Avatar of Chess_Player_lol
marqumax wrote:

According to @TacticalPrecision here are the "sissies" 

@Chess_Player_lol

@Gawain_Jones0

and me

Our feminity is going through his screen. He's obviously out there socializing. Living a life... on chess forums. 

To be honest it is not surprizing. Considering the fact that he's called 

"DigitalDestruction" on lichess 

How much more male can a person get? No wonder everyone looks like a sissy to him... He said it... he has a driving licence... what a man

@TacticalPrecision in case you didnt know that is sarcasm

Avatar of PerpetualPatzer123

His first (I think) Chess.com (troll) account was @DigitalWarfare. Now, being banned many times, has come back as @TacticalPrecision. He denies it, but @DigitalDestruction and @DigitalWarfare are too similar to not be the same. They even talk the same way, and they both always rant about speed chess and whatnot. 

 

Edit

@DigitalDestruction is an account here, too! 

Avatar of BabyCow73

Yep wud make sense

Avatar of zeeeenith

*eAtS pOpCoRn*

Avatar of Maximus241

brooo guys stop wth xd

 

Avatar of ChesswithGautham

What did I miss out on this time?

Avatar of PhilippineDoggo
ShadowCellen wrote:
TacticalPrecision wrote:

It's a 10/0. It means nothing. 

?

Dont mind him. Hes a troll.

Avatar of PhilippineDoggo
PhilippineDoggo wrote:
ShadowCellen wrote:
TacticalPrecision wrote:

It's a 10/0. It means nothing. 

?

Dont mind him. Hes a troll.

I think im gonna keep my mouth shut.

Avatar of ChesswithGautham

EAts POPcorn

Avatar of PhilippineDoggo

I guess i can send mine too.

@TacticalPrecision, pls dont comment on this.

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/40887581261

Avatar of 1g1yy

I played a game today that scored 100%. Trouble is, on move three I played a Gambit which reduced my evaluation from +.1 to -.5.  I would like to think that at least qualifies as an inaccuracy, but evidently since it was a book move, I still got full credit.

Mine was only seven moves. The Ops game was much longer and didn't have any dips in the graph that I can see. Just a very steady Improvement of the evaluation. Congrats on a great game.

Avatar of NostalgiclySmart

bravo

 

Avatar of Maximus241
PhilippineDoggo wrote:

I guess i can send mine too.

@TacticalPrecision, pls dont comment on this.

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/40887581261

feel u used a engine or its your alt if not nice job

Avatar of Kowarenai

...

Avatar of Maximus241
cookiesrlife08 wrote:

also this game sus bc this guy is 1200+ and no 1200+ is that dumb

Avatar of MohammadSadraM

می شود ترجمه کنید به زبان فارسی

Avatar of PhilippineDoggo
Maximus241 wrote:
PhilippineDoggo wrote:

I guess i can send mine too.

@TacticalPrecision, pls dont comment on this.

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/40887581261

feel u used a engine or its your alt if not nice job

Nah. I didn't. I didn't even think f6 was Mate in 5 for White, I just thought I got accidental mate after playing around with checks.

Avatar of PhilippineDoggo

But I think when the engine changes its mind, Ill just get 97-99 accuracy.

Avatar of PhilippineDoggo
Maximus241 wrote:
cookiesrlife08 wrote:

also this game sus bc this guy is 1200+ and no 1200+ is that dumb

There are some ppl tho. I almost got the same result as this, but they resigned after hanging their queen.

Avatar of Maximus241
TheSwissPhoenix wrote:

Bro what about your games what about one of your best games was it like that graph? Probably right so we’re you cheating? If you use your logic, you were cheating, but you know that is a contradiction, proving that he didn’t cheat. Oh yeah and op is 2000 fide so shut up.

who are u saying this to? im saying the guy who first got the 100% is good the 2000 guy but the other games the other people sent are sus