The 2000 player must have been trolling.
The 1700 should be able to draw that K+P ending.
The 1300 played better than either one IMO.
Still good games though.
The 2000 player must have been trolling.
The 1700 should be able to draw that K+P ending.
The 1300 played better than either one IMO.
Still good games though.
shepi13 thanks for your comments. however regarding 1700 player game . he could not draw the game K-P ending.he was easily going to lose .you should check your analysis properly.
Come on... No offense here but how can you say these are your best games?? Show us a standard game, not blitz crap. In blitz even a 2000 rated player can fall for a Scholar's Mate. (I remember how Jerry - ChessNetwork managed to get mated in a few moves). The games you show are not even blitz actually, more like bullet.
krestez, as per my own level of playing chess , these games are the best for me.
as per my view, in standard games, you have to think and play your moves. whereas in blitz or bullet games, you have to recognize the pattern or position quickly and play.
playing blitz really helped to me remember some patterns and positions effectively.
yeah sure i will show my best standard games here. unfortunately i don't get so much time to play standard games. :(
someone plz explain me what u mean by this comment :
The 1300 played better than either one IMO.
i am not able to understand
1. http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=542528813 defeated a 1700 rated player.
2. http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=543012846 defeated a 1340 rated player.
3. http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=543029295 defeated a 2000 rated player
these are my best games till now