Hello,
The opening was a big theory line. Some big name players like Anand, and Adams have played the black side, although dont understand it myself, they must think get enough play for pawn after 12Nxb5. The game followed Acs v Blehm 2000 upto 21Bb5. Think black should of found something else before going that far. There was a correspondence game with 15...Ne4, have no idea of standard of players, but if that works tactically then evaluation of line would be changed.
Good quality game.
Bye John S
Throughout my chess games, I have played some good moves. I saw a mate from 8 from the start, I played a mate in 9 unintentionally. However, those games were always spoilt by something like a huge blunder, and I have never submitted anything to the games showcase forum.
But this game neither side made any major blunders, one that doesn't feel like what i call the "sucker punch" chess i usually play. Basically, I wait for my opponent to screw up (often baiting him, but not attacking) and pound him until he dies. This game, I used this amazing thing called strategy, and its the most solid game I've ever played. Enjoy, some annotations for easier understanding. 1 in depth explanation of why my opponent picked the right move.
The first time somebody resigned for positional reasons as well.