ooh, what a hot chick

Sort:
Avatar of LAexpress12

ok the title was to get your attention i finally got the Bxh7 trick. observe.

Avatar of Insane_Chess

You're lucky that Black developed his Knight to the wrong square. Also your Bishop didn't have that discovered check on the diagonal, so I don't know why Black moved to g6 with the King.

Nice game, though!

Avatar of LAexpress12

ecehs that wasnt her name i just made that part up to go with the title :)

Avatar of LAexpress12

Insane ches i think the theme is that if black is passively developed and there is the bishop on d3, knight of f3, And queen in starting position against a regularliy castled king (no pushed pawns) the player should look for themes like this.

Avatar of ZayarShay

nice

Avatar of Insane_Chess
FullmetalAlchemist wrote:

Insane ches i think the theme is that if black is passively developed and there is the bishop on d3, knight of f3, And queen in starting position against a regularliy castled king (no pushed pawns) the player should look for themes like this.


In order for there to be checkmate against a good defensive player, the f6-square has to be covered, usually by a pawn on e5. If there is a defender on f6 or if f6 can be occupied by a piece, then there are more defending chances. Also, the second Bishop is usually necessary to get a solid mating net.

Not saying your sacrifice here was a bad move. In fact, it was very correct IMO because of the e7-Knight. What I was saying is that Black would have had better chances if he had played 9...Kh6 and later N-g6 because then it wouldn't be a discovered check.

Avatar of ozzie_c_cobblepot
Insane_Chess wrote:
FullmetalAlchemist wrote:

Insane ches i think the theme is that if black is passively developed and there is the bishop on d3, knight of f3, And queen in starting position against a regularliy castled king (no pushed pawns) the player should look for themes like this.


In order for there to be checkmate against a good defensive player, the f6-square has to be covered, usually by a pawn on e5. If there is a defender on f6 or if f6 can be occupied by a piece, then there are more defending chances. Also, the second Bishop is usually necessary to get a solid mating net.

Not saying your sacrifice here was a bad move. In fact, it was very correct IMO because of the e7-Knight. What I was saying is that Black would have had better chances if he had played 9...Kh6 and later N-g6 because then it wouldn't be a discovered check.


After 9...Kh6 wouldn't white follow-up with 10.e4

Or am I missing something?

Avatar of Insane_Chess

He'd have to spend a tempi to do it. And then Black can move his Queen so the dicovered check doesn't win more than a pawn.

Avatar of LAexpress12
\Gambitking wrote:

Nice game, but why didn't you play h4 instead of castling--I thought that was the standard procedure...


 because othere wise after the double capture on e5 then i coul;dnt capture back because my pawn would be pinnned

Avatar of jaberer
Insane_Chess wrote:

You're lucky that Black developed his Knight to the wrong square. Also your Bishop didn't have that discovered check on the diagonal, so I don't know why Black moved to g6 with the King.

Nice game, though!


 After Kg6, Qh5 and unstoppable Mate comes....

Avatar of Conflagration_Planet

I was gonna say, I thought you were one.

Avatar of electricpawn
woodshover wrote:

I was gonna say, I thought you were one.


 Are you, Woodshover?

Avatar of Conflagration_Planet
electricpawn wrote:
woodshover wrote:

I was gonna say, I thought you were one.


 Are you, Woodshover?


 No. Why do you ask?

Avatar of electricpawn
woodshover wrote:
electricpawn wrote:
woodshover wrote:

I was gonna say, I thought you were one.


 Are you, Woodshover?


 No. Why do you ask?


 Why did you think the OP was one?

Avatar of Conflagration_Planet
electricpawn wrote:
woodshover wrote:
electricpawn wrote:
woodshover wrote:

I was gonna say, I thought you were one.


 Are you, Woodshover?


 No. Why do you ask?


 Why did you think the OP was one?


 Because of the avatar.

Avatar of electricpawn
woodshover wrote:
electricpawn wrote:
woodshover wrote:
electricpawn wrote:
woodshover wrote:

I was gonna say, I thought you were one.


 Are you, Woodshover?


 No. Why do you ask?


 Why did you think the OP was one?


 Because of the avatar.


 The dude's name is Edward!

Avatar of Musikamole
electricpawn wrote:
woodshover wrote:
electricpawn wrote:
woodshover wrote:
electricpawn wrote:
woodshover wrote:

I was gonna say, I thought you were one.


 Are you, Woodshover?


 No. Why do you ask?


 Why did you think the OP was one?


 Because of the avatar.


 The dude's name is Edward!


Laughing  Laughing  Laughing  Laughing  Laughing

Avatar of Conflagration_Planet
electricpawn wrote:
woodshover wrote:
electricpawn wrote:
woodshover wrote:
electricpawn wrote:
woodshover wrote:

I was gonna say, I thought you were one.


 Are you, Woodshover?


 No. Why do you ask?


 Why did you think the OP was one?


 Because of the avatar.


 The dude's name is Edward!


 Oh, I never noticed! I guess the avatar DOES look like a teenage boy, now that I look at it again.

Avatar of LAexpress12

are you talking about me? i feel concerned when people talk about me.

Avatar of Gambitknight
[COMMENT DELETED]