chessPlatypus01 wrote:
batgirl wrote:
StinkingHyena wrote:
I think the chess.com analysis is more than a bit wonky.
I don't know if I ever heard an American use the term "wonky." (to be fair, I'm not sure I ever heard anyone use it before.)
my friend blundered his knight and rook in a game but got 90 accuracy dont trust it
You'll have a high accuracy if you play enough good moves besides those blunders. It doesn't matter if you match the engine on all but two of your moves, if those two moves lose the game 
I think the chess.com analysis is more than a bit wonky.
I don't know if I ever heard an American use the term "wonky." (to be fair, I'm not sure I ever heard anyone use it before.)
my friend blundered his knight and rook in a game but got 90 accuracy dont trust it