This game shows why you shouldn't take everything what your opponent gives!
On move 13 Nxb7 is a mistake- Nxf7 is better as the position repeats.
Sacrafice!
Sort:
I don't think he's going to win a chess oscar for Qxb2
alec945x wrote:
I don't think he's going to win a chess oscar for Qxb2
What, they give oscars for chess now?
sasha2 wrote:
What, they give oscars for chess now?
The oscar is awarded every year the winner is selected by a poll of experts and grandmasters anand won it in 2007 and 2008.
he could receive a darwin award for chess stupidity
imaginati0n7 wrote:
he could receive a darwin award for chess stupidity
Wow, can't you try to say a compliment, its not to hard.
Also remember- no bums allowed!
Nov 10, 2009
0
#7
Good work! This really shows how striking against an opponent before you've developed really hurts you (speaking from Black's POV). Not only does black lose what small amount of material is developed, he ends up losing the queen too... and soon the game.
AnthonyCG wrote:
This is why newbies shouldn't play 1...c5.
...Bb4 isn't a book move and ...Bc5 is just him getting emotional.
Sicillian - chess fundamentals = lose and then lose some more
7.Be3 is just the right move here. Even if there wasn't a trap, Black would be too behind in development to do anything about it anyway.
7...Nc6 was better and probably leads to some tactical mess but Black is in trouble already.
The opponent that I played had a low rating (I think he only started soon, since he's rating was 1200).