never going to try bcz it will never work
The Chinese gambit
Sort:
better play thar system
SacrifycedStoat wrote:
Why would white blunder mate there? It seems really simple to play Bxc6 or h3
Besides, it only delays the inevitable
Mar 11, 2026
0
#28
SacrifycedStoat wrote:
Why would white blunder mate there? It seems really simple to play Bxc6 or h3
Agreed. Black has to play worse then f5 g5 for this to happen.
Mar 11, 2026
0
#29
maxwell4114 wrote:
Mathnerd2015 wrote:
Why don’t u guys just let Chinese people choose how they want their gambit to be like
dude, chess in asia is kinda rare, not many people play it in china, let alone study opening theory. plus, it's not even an official opening name, these are all just for fun
yea but practically half the number of chess prodigies you see on the uscf top 100 lists are asian. So even if it isnt popular in asia, asian people enjoy the game a lot in the US.
Mar 11, 2026
0
#30
C_A_T_S_C_H_E_S_S wrote:
SacrifycedStoat wrote:
Why would white blunder mate there? It seems really simple to play Bxc6 or h3
Besides, it only delays the inevitable
No. White can literally just lock the position down with Bxc6 and Nfd2, like SacrifycedStoat said.
Mar 11, 2026
0
#31
What even is the point of an opening if it only works for under any elo? Openings can only be categorized into sound and unsound, sound ones are decent openings that we all play, unsound ones (several aggressive gambits, such as the Halloween Gambit) should not be played at any level to prevent practicing something useless. Your opening falls into the second category (no offense intended). Also, the naming is objectionable at best, you can name it something else please.
YavinMoon wrote:
C_A_T_S_C_H_E_S_S wrote:
SacrifycedStoat wrote:
Why would white blunder mate there? It seems really simple to play Bxc6 or h3
Besides, it only delays the inevitable
No. White can literally just lock the position down with Bxc6 and Nfd2, like SacrifycedStoat said.
what? its a quote in a quote
C_A_T_S_C_H_E_S_S wrote:
YavinMoon wrote:
C_A_T_S_C_H_E_S_S wrote:
SacrifycedStoat wrote:
Why would white blunder mate there? It seems really simple to play Bxc6 or h3
Besides, it only delays the inevitable
No. White can literally just lock the position down with Bxc6 and Nfd2, like SacrifycedStoat said.
what? its a quote in a quote
now its a quote in a quote in a quote in a quote i think
HeisukeKogami wrote:
What even is the point of an opening if it only works for under any elo? Openings can only be categorized into sound and unsound, sound ones are decent openings that we all play, unsound ones (several aggressive gambits, such as the Halloween Gambit) should not be played at any level to prevent practicing something useless. Your opening falls into the second category (no offense intended). Also, the naming is objectionable at best, you can name it something else please.
how to rename
Why don’t u guys just let Chinese people choose how they want their gambit to be like
dude, chess in asia is kinda rare, not many people play it in china, let alone study opening theory. plus, it's not even an official opening name, these are all just for fun