Of course jumping to conclusions didn't help your cause at all, now did it Nabeel! LOL
Very unsportsmanlike(he gets 4 queens!!!!!)
Sort:
My cause was to prove that running from a game would not be of any advantage to you. Accept it suggo. Everybuddy loses. Does it make any difference. And yes if I could not have you realize the fact, my cause was not helped. And by the way, dont ask people to die of monotony by writing here in a dead forum topic.
Even if you want to score points only, lets join some new forum topic and carry on this debate.
Debate? What are we debating? I didn't think there were any facts here that we disagreed about!!?? I wasn't running away from any game, I don't mind losing, happens all the time and you jumped in and made accusations that were incorrect. Are you debating any of that?
I didn't make any accusations. I did make the final statement though 
. And man I loved that.
LOL, so you preach about losing but want to boast about winning?
And yeah, you did make accusations!
Winning from a rude player 
. A lesson well taught on board. Winning is NOT boasting. And sorry buddy I dont have any potions to treat the burning.
LOL, now I am the rude one! I was playing the game, along with my other games..a couple of minutes later I come back to accusations of leaving because I was losing!?? And because I don't appreciate false accusations that makes me the rude player?? LOL You aren't related to Borgqueen are you? lol
WoW!
u c. we have awaken the sleeping giants again .
And avoided the questions! 
pizzaking wrote:
x34xElfekix34x wrote:
Well First off I hardly ever quit, Secondly I was kinda hoping for a stalemate
That's a very disrespectful attitude. Your opponent beat you handily and yet you think he's going to be so dumb as to leave you in stalemate?
I could understand if there was something instructive about the endgame (ie, B&N vs K) giving you both practise but by move 40 it was finished.
He should have promoted to bring all his pieces back and return them to their starting squares.
IMHO respect or lack of it should not be linked to resigning or not. One is perfectly entitled to hope for a stalemate through opponent's blunder. After all a player may have reached a superior position through a blunder of his opponent. Additionally, while one tries not to get checkmated, one learns other aspects of game which might come handy in future. The fighting spirit of 'you haven't lost till you have lost and haven't won till you have won' applies to chess as much as to any other sport. For me disrespect is when a player does not play with his or her full power against a supposedly weaker player.
here's a tip: don't play him again for the sake of reputation and embarrassment.
Once my opponent had 1 queen. I just got away with a win. I had only 3.
Skand wrote:
pizzaking wrote:
x34xElfekix34x wrote:
Well First off I hardly ever quit, Secondly I was kinda hoping for a stalemate
That's a very disrespectful attitude. Your opponent beat you handily and yet you think he's going to be so dumb as to leave you in stalemate?
I could understand if there was something instructive about the endgame (ie, B&N vs K) giving you both practise but by move 40 it was finished.
He should have promoted to bring all his pieces back and return them to their starting squares.
IMHO respect or lack of it should not be linked to resigning or not. One is perfectly entitled to hope for a stalemate through opponent's blunder. After all a player may have reached a superior position through a blunder of his opponent. Additionally, while one tries not to get checkmated, one learns other aspects of game which might come handy in future. The fighting spirit of 'you haven't lost till you have lost and haven't won till you have won' applies to chess as much as to any other sport. For me disrespect is when a player does not play with his or her full power against a supposedly weaker player.
I agree.
richie_and_oprah wrote:
manymercsmike wrote:
Gata Kamsky almost never gave up in any game, or match, situation.
That was back when his father was his megalomaniacal manager.
It did not make him many friends and may have hurt his networking.
Yet another social aspect to our game.
I once got six queens in an online game. AT the beginning of the game he played bishop takes f7 and i was completely winning the entire game.
Ur just trolling
Dec 6, 2023
0
#238
People who need multiple queens just don't know how to finish a mate. Or are egotistical sadists. Either way I will fight to the end.
Ha ha ha! Not listening to the board would cause you to listen to a volume of million posts
. I guess I alone could not speak that much.