I remeber lookng at Bb3 durig the game, but it was hard for me to calculate.
(what do you want fro me, I'm only mortal.)
It is an honor to have a NM commenting o my game, and not pointing out gross blunders! Thank you.
I remeber lookng at Bb3 durig the game, but it was hard for me to calculate.
(what do you want fro me, I'm only mortal.)
It is an honor to have a NM commenting o my game, and not pointing out gross blunders! Thank you.
I really enjoyed watching your game. Do you always play in this fashion, or were you just trying a new style out? Extremely creative and ferocious!
21. Kd3?? was a blunder, his king was very well developed and could have made a run on the other side man.
Everyone but me seems to like this game. Well congrats I guess it's a crowd-pleaser. Sorry to be the sour puss my wife yelled at me this morning and it gave a bad attitude ... I can't get past the opening and the minor piece sac. It's so unsound!
JG27Pyth: just because it's unsound doesn't mean it's not an interesting game to look at? Aesthetics and accuracy do not necessarilly go hand in hand... or they could, depending on what you yourself view as worthwhile.
Insane_Chess: and that's why you're worthy of the name Insane_Chess.
Still, I hold that the knight sac is very interesting, and after that g4?! intermezzo, the only way to pursue real winning chances.
Insane_Chess: and that's why you're worthy of the name Insane_Chess.
Hahaha! You should see some of my tournament games...I once made a sacrifice in a KID as White and won in 6-7 moves. Turns out it was unsound, but my opponent was under enough pressure that I won anyway. (he was 1800-1850)
This was the greatest live game I've ever played!