Hot Take: people who say some opening is only valid at certain ratings are trolling at best and being spiteful at worst.
Sure, go ahead and play najdorf at 1000. Its TOTALLY valid and perfectly playable
Right. Perfect example.
Sans sarcasm please ..
Hot Take: people who say some opening is only valid at certain ratings are trolling at best and being spiteful at worst.
Sure, go ahead and play najdorf at 1000. Its TOTALLY valid and perfectly playable
Right. Perfect example.
Sans sarcasm please ..
Wow congrats on 3k! Also, I don’t see what nonotro said that’s political…
Thanks and also they were talking about the flags on chess.com and stuff(like north korea).
Yeah I know but I didn’t see anything overly political nonotro had said specifically, as I said in my comment. Etymologist had just quoted the wrong thing it turns out.
Oh, ok. Yeah that's a great idea then. 😏
I agree that there are better things to improve on and spend time on then learning the Najdorf in your case
Oh, ok. Yeah that's a great idea then. 😏
I agree that there are better things to improve on and spend time on then learning the Najdorf in your case
Thanks Fras and this is quite a decent message.
Oh, ok. Yeah that's a great idea then. 😏
I agree that there are better things to improve on and spend time on then learning the Najdorf in your case
NOOOOO! How can you say that???? Najdorf is the core essential to chess, even a 100 rated player should learn najdorf. Anybody who thinks otherwise is a troll at best and spiteful at worst
100 Elo player playing 10 book moves then blundering their queen, still with 100% opening accuracy and like 20% middle game. I don’t think I’ve even seen a 100 care enough about chess to study the Najdorf
Just listen to me then if you were to make that club lol. Maybe you could create a Hot Takes Club lol
Wow congrats on 3k! Also, I don’t see what nonotro said that’s political…
Yes I made a mistake there, quoted the wrong post.