JonThree wrote:
Move 53. Just thought it was interesting - a move that the engine wouldn't have played that turned out to be better than the engine when analyzed
Not quite sure what your comment means but it is a little easier to get people to view your post when you include the game here instead of forcing them to follow a broken link.
Well, I guess it was a very good move since it draws the game by taking the opposition.
Move 53. Just thought it was interesting - a move that the engine wouldn't have played that turned out to be better than the engine when analyzed
https://www.chess.com/analysis?autorun=true&pgn=%5BEvent%20%22vs%20Computer%22%5D%0A%5BSite%20%22Chess.com%22%5D%0A%5BDate%20%222021.03.29%22%5D%0A%5BRound%20%22?%22%5D%0A%5BWhite%20%22Isabel%22%5D%0A%5BBlack%20%22JonThree%22%5D%0A%5BResult%20%221/2-1/2%22%5D%0A%5BTimeControl%20%22-%22%5D%0A%0A1.%20Nf3%20d5%202.%20d4%20e6%203.%20c4%20c6%204.%20Qc2%20Na6%205.%20cxd5%20Nb4%206.%20Qd1%20Nxd5%207.%20Nc3%20Nxc3%208.%0Abxc3%20g6%209.%20Bg5%20Qa5%2010.%20Qd3%20Bg7%2011.%20e4%20Nf6%2012.%20e5%20Nd5%2013.%20Rc1%20Qxa2%2014.%20Qc2%20Qxc2%0A15.%20Rxc2%20O-O%2016.%20c4%20Nb4%2017.%20Rb2%20a5%2018.%20Bd2%20Bd7%2019.%20Bxb4%20axb4%2020.%20Rxb4%20Ra1%2B%2021.%0AKe2%20b5%2022.%20Kd3%20bxc4%2B%2023.%20Rxc4%20Rb8%2024.%20h4%20Rb3%2B%2025.%20Rc3%20Rb2%2026.%20g4%20Rxf2%2027.%20Nd2%0ARf4%2028.%20Bg2%20Rxh1%2029.%20Bxh1%20Rxg4%2030.%20Nf3%20f6%2031.%20exf6%20Bxf6%2032.%20Ne5%20Bxe5%2033.%20dxe5%0ARxh4%2034.%20Bg2%20Rh2%2035.%20Bf3%20h5%2036.%20Bxc6%20Bxc6%2037.%20Rxc6%20Rh3%2B%2038.%20Kd2%20Kg7%2039.%20Rc7%2B%20Kh6%0A40.%20Rc6%20h4%2041.%20Rxe6%20Rh2%2B%2042.%20Ke3%20h3%2043.%20Rd6%20Rg2%2044.%20Rb6%20h2%2045.%20Rb1%20Rg3%2B%2046.%20Kf2%0ARh3%2047.%20Rh1%20Kg7%2048.%20Kg2%20Rh5%2049.%20Kg3%20Kf7%2050.%20Rxh2%20Rxh2%2051.%20Kxh2%20Ke6%2052.%20Kg2%20Kxe5%0A53.%20Kg3%20Kf5%2054.%20Kf3%20g5%2055.%20Kg3%20g4%2056.%20Kh2%20Kf4%2057.%20Kg2%20g3%2058.%20Kg1%20Kf3%2059.%20Kh1%20g2%2B%0A60.%20Kg1%20Kg3%201/2-1/2&tab=analysis&referrer=vs-computer-analyze