The accuracy scatter is just too much for him to be legit
Addressing the 2200 point upset situation
Sort:
3 days ago
0
#3
CTLemerand wrote:
Hello chess.com community, recently I discovered the chess player @IT-WAS-EZ because he was seemingly some ipad kid who barely knew how to play chess, yelling at us in the gothamchess vs the world vote for making the only move that could prolong checkmate, Unfortunately I no longer have access to our chats there, but after I took a look at his games, I wished I had screenshotted the texts, he was rated 100 in everything except daily, yet in unranked games he had beat a 2300 rated player, @GMlightining2200, in a message to this user he claimed to be 2400 on lichess, although he never provided an account. I myself decided to go against him in a daily game where I was crushed, In the review of that game it said he had 95% accuracy, however when I looked through his games, some of his blitz games had as low as 7% accuracy. At this point I am certain he selectively cheats against higher rated opponents, and/or is a sandbagger trying to look cool, the final oddity of this account I would like to report is its age, it is only three days old and the player claimed to have learned chess the day his account was made. I do not have enough experience in these matters to draw a definite conclusion, however I hope in the comments we can finally piece together what happened, below is a chart of his game accuracy, where you can see several spikes, the middle ones where I believe he cheated against @GMlightning2200, and the last one where I was cheated against in a daily game.
wait wasn't it @IT-WUZ-EZ
bryuifjf wrote:
CTLemerand wrote:
Hello chess.com community, recently I discovered the chess player @IT-WAS-EZ because he was seemingly some ipad kid who barely knew how to play chess, yelling at us in the gothamchess vs the world vote for making the only move that could prolong checkmate, Unfortunately I no longer have access to our chats there, but after I took a look at his games, I wished I had screenshotted the texts, he was rated 100 in everything except daily, yet in unranked games he had beat a 2300 rated player, @GMlightining2200, in a message to this user he claimed to be 2400 on lichess, although he never provided an account. I myself decided to go against him in a daily game where I was crushed, In the review of that game it said he had 95% accuracy, however when I looked through his games, some of his blitz games had as low as 7% accuracy. At this point I am certain he selectively cheats against higher rated opponents, and/or is a sandbagger trying to look cool, the final oddity of this account I would like to report is its age, it is only three days old and the player claimed to have learned chess the day his account was made. I do not have enough experience in these matters to draw a definite conclusion, however I hope in the comments we can finally piece together what happened, below is a chart of his game accuracy, where you can see several spikes, the middle ones where I believe he cheated against @GMlightning2200, and the last one where I was cheated against in a daily game.
wait wasn't it @IT-WUZ-EZ
dang I spelled his name wrong, Ill fix that
IT-WUZ-EZ wrote:
#inb4thelock
#inb4urban
IT-WUZ-EZ wrote:
CTLemerand wrote:
IT-WUZ-EZ wrote:
#inb4thelock
#inb4urban
Banned for what? Beating you in 10 moves?
Wake up and smell the end kid, your accuracy is all over the place, and you always seem to have the highest accuracy when playing against a higher elo player, or someone who is on to you, read my article, look at the chart
3 days ago
0
#7
IT-WUZ-EZ wrote:
GMlightining2200 wrote:
The accuracy scatter is just too much for him to be legit
If anyone is cheating here, it's you. How did you get 2300 in the first place? You play like a 1600.
Well, I win games, gain rating, eventually I got to 2300😂. Even if I played like a 1600 you shouldn't be able to beat me is a 100
IT-WUZ-EZ wrote:
How is this still not locked? Wake up, mods...
It's just another smurf, looking for attention. Kids, these days ...
Perhaps. In that case, “Adults, these days!”
@Fet i would destroy you in a 1v1 match. I'm a prodigy
3 days ago
0
#14
IT-WUZ-EZ wrote:
I bet I would obliterate everything here (other than @lunasantin) in a proctored best of 31 hyperbullet match.
What about @lunasantin disables you from "destroying him"
GMlightining2200 wrote:
IT-WUZ-EZ wrote:
I bet I would obliterate everything here (other than @lunasantin) in a proctored best of 31 hyperbullet match.
What about @lunasantin disables you from "destroying him"
3 days ago
0
#17
At the very least there’s been a huge influx of “very new” chess accounts who somehow already know how to play chess and everything about the chesscom community (including high profile troll accounts like hangingpiecechomper). Whether these individuals are cheating or just lying about their proficiency and experience for fun, I’m not sure. But either way, something needs to be done about them.
IT-WUZ-EZ a écrit :
GMlightining2200 wrote:
IT-WUZ-EZ wrote:
I bet I would obliterate everything here (other than @lunasantin) in a proctored best of 31 hyperbullet match.
What about @lunasantin disables you from "destroying him"
@lunasantin is related to Claude Bloodgood, who peaked at 2789 USCF.
So what ? Is he him ?
lunasantin wrote:
GMlightining2200 wrote:
IT-WUZ-EZ wrote:
I bet I would obliterate everything here (other than @lunasantin) in a proctored best of 31 hyperbullet match.
What about @lunasantin disables you from "destroying him"
Guys please take this to another forum
3 days ago
0
#20
IT-WUZ-EZ wrote:
GMlightining2200 wrote:
IT-WUZ-EZ wrote:
I bet I would obliterate everything here (other than @lunasantin) in a proctored best of 31 hyperbullet match.
What about @lunasantin disables you from "destroying him"
@lunasantin is related to Claude Bloodgood, who peaked at 2789 USCF.
Well it doesn't work this way u know? not because you're magnus's son doesn't mean your a great player
Hello chess.com community, recently I discovered the chess player @IT-WUZ-EZ because he was seemingly some ipad kid who barely knew how to play chess, yelling at us in the gothamchess vs the world vote for making the only move that could prolong checkmate, Unfortunately I no longer have access to our chats there, but after I took a look at his games, I wished I had screenshotted the texts, he was rated 100 in everything except daily, yet in unranked games he had beat a 2300 rated player, @GMlightining2200, in a message to this user he claimed to be 2400 on lichess, although he never provided an account. I myself decided to go against him in a daily game where I was crushed, In the review of that game it said he had 95% accuracy, however when I looked through his games, some of his blitz games had as low as 7% accuracy. At this point I am certain he selectively cheats against higher rated opponents, and/or is a sandbagger trying to look cool, the final oddity of this account I would like to report is its age, it is only three days old and the player claimed to have learned chess the day his account was made. I do not have enough experience in these matters to draw a definite conclusion, however I hope in the comments we can finally piece together what happened, below is a chart of his game accuracy, where you can see several spikes, the middle ones where I believe he cheated against @GMlightning2200, and the last one where I was cheated against in a daily game.
