Aggressive or Solid

Sort:
chesschesskid
Marie-AnneLiz wrote:
Sred a écrit :
Marie-AnneLiz wrote:
Sred a écrit :
Marie-AnneLiz wrote:
nighteyes1234 a écrit :
EricFloNicole wrote:
 

He cannot win,that is a silly goal! the goal is not to get destroyed in 40 moves! 

a 1500 against a 2200  = 0% chance of winning!

 

I lost in 10 moves playing white...so its not zero chance. The game description said "One player managed to earn the win"....which is an interesting way of putting it, since chess.com claimed I lost internet connection for 1 min.

You are right it's not 0 it's just under 1%;you are happy now?

my club federation chart say  735 elo points under it's 0%.... so statically it's under .5%

That is a statistic not God word! 

Why not just admit that it's not 0 and you were wrong?

Why not shut up if you have nothing nice to say!

Oh i understand you live in a world or everything is black and white,you never heard of the word statistic! for you it's just a game of putting peoples down because you are so superior!

Statistics does say that it's not 0. Case closed.

And in reality OTB it's 0. Case closed!

sorry but there is a slight chance for lower player to win lik 0.5% or something

CASE CLOSED!

Marie-AnneLiz
chesschesskid a écrit :
Marie-AnneLiz wrote:
Sred a écrit :
Marie-AnneLiz wrote:
Sred a écrit :
Marie-AnneLiz wrote:
nighteyes1234 a écrit :
EricFloNicole wrote:
 

He cannot win,that is a silly goal! the goal is not to get destroyed in 40 moves! 

a 1500 against a 2200  = 0% chance of winning!

 

I lost in 10 moves playing white...so its not zero chance. The game description said "One player managed to earn the win"....which is an interesting way of putting it, since chess.com claimed I lost internet connection for 1 min.

You are right it's not 0 it's just under 1%;you are happy now?

my club federation chart say  735 elo points under it's 0%.... so statically it's under .5%

That is a statistic not God word! 

Why not just admit that it's not 0 and you were wrong?

Why not shut up if you have nothing nice to say!

Oh i understand you live in a world or everything is black and white,you never heard of the word statistic! for you it's just a game of putting peoples down because you are so superior!

Statistics does say that it's not 0. Case closed.

And in reality OTB it's 0. Case closed!

sorry but there is a slight chance for lower player to win lik 0.5% or something

CASE CLOSED!

Not a 1500 here against  two real title player here;that was the context! 

Do you realize that .4% is 1 game in 200?

We were not talking about playing 200000000000000000000000 games to try to win one!

We were talking about a real player here rated at 1500 playing 2 games against 2 titles players!

I think you are way to late to this discussion!

Context matter! we were not talking about 100 or 200 games! but about 2 games!

chesschesskid
Marie-AnneLiz wrote:
chesschesskid a écrit :
Marie-AnneLiz wrote:
Sred a écrit :
Marie-AnneLiz wrote:
Sred a écrit :
Marie-AnneLiz wrote:
nighteyes1234 a écrit :
EricFloNicole wrote:
 

He cannot win,that is a silly goal! the goal is not to get destroyed in 40 moves! 

a 1500 against a 2200  = 0% chance of winning!

 

I lost in 10 moves playing white...so its not zero chance. The game description said "One player managed to earn the win"....which is an interesting way of putting it, since chess.com claimed I lost internet connection for 1 min.

You are right it's not 0 it's just under 1%;you are happy now?

my club federation chart say  735 elo points under it's 0%.... so statically it's under .5%

That is a statistic not God word! 

Why not just admit that it's not 0 and you were wrong?

Why not shut up if you have nothing nice to say!

Oh i understand you live in a world or everything is black and white,you never heard of the word statistic! for you it's just a game of putting peoples down because you are so superior!

Statistics does say that it's not 0. Case closed.

And in reality OTB it's 0. Case closed!

sorry but there is a slight chance for lower player to win lik 0.5% or something

CASE CLOSED!

Not a 1500 here against  two real title player here;that was the context! 

Do you realize that .4% is 1 game in 200?

We were not talking about playing 200000000000000000000000 games to try to win one!

We were talking about a real player here rated at 1500 playing 2 games against 2 titles players!

I think you are way to late to this discussion!

Context matter! we were not talking about 100 or 200 games! but about 2 games!

we are talking about actual probability not theoretical

it wont always happen 1 in 200 games

but i get where u are coming at there is barely any chance but not 0

nighteyes1234
chesschesskid wrote:
 

we are talking about actual probability not theoretical

it wont always happen 1 in 200 games

but i get where u are coming at there is barely any chance but not 0

 

Yeah, just sayin. Its enough though that the game will not be rated probably. Not to bring up those days where someone 1500 is suddenly 'engine like' strength. Its usually eggshells when a streamer talks about how the game is not going as expected.

 

Mako_Cat

And my thread has been bumped by hvenki

sndeww

Nice

chessfox0212

Play your style, if you play agressive chess then go all out. And if you play solid chess, it's not bad either.

Make sure you play the opening you know the best.

You'll have a good game.

Good luck.happy.png

ponz111

it is neither--it is usually just poor chess.