12 draws?? Seriously????
Anand-Carlsen, 12 draws.....FIDE do something!!
Sort:
Nothing wrong with draws...their goal is to win the match, not please patzers. Plus, the last 2 games were quite exciting, not "without creativity." lol
Whate are you talking about you idiot, games 3 and 4 were very exciting draws both of them are playing to win.
they played 12 games already?
Rating is inversely proportional to offense taken at the draws.
Exiting or not, if its 12 draws and next time WC 10 draws, then we may have to look into the drawing rule...
bloons wrote:
they played 12 games already?
plz answer my question someone
bloons wrote:
bloons wrote:
they played 12 games already?
plz answer my question someone
They have played 4.
oh... so how 12 draws?
bloons wrote:
oh... so how 12 draws?
The OP isn't blessed in the brains department.
Scottrf wrote:
bloons wrote:
oh... so how 12 draws?
The OP isn't blessed in the brains department.
what?
i find last games getting more exciting despite of the draws, probably we see even better games, they are warming up! like a lot of people has said, we just need a win whoever that is in a game for this to become really interesting, i hope its sooner so we see more action.
Nov 14, 2013
0
#14
bloons wrote:
oh... so how 12 draws?
The OP is making a rash assumption that all 12 games will end up a draw.
The last World Championship started this way. There were 10 draws in 12 games with the 2 decisive results occurring back-to-back.
I predict one of them will win a single game with White, and will win the match that way. I predict no tie-break this time!
bloons wrote:
oh... so how 12 draws?
Because they only play moves calculated by the computer. The only thing they have to do, is to remember the chess-computer's move. Well both players have extremely good memory, so it is understanable that every game ends in a standard draw.
FIDE has to introduce new rules. F.e. 3 standard moves in a row = penalty (opponet gets 1 move extra )
VeeDeeVee wrote:
Because they only play moves calculated by the computer. The only thing they have to do, is to remember the chess-computer's move. Well both players have extremely good memory, so it is understanable that every game ends in a standard draw.
Seriously dude, if you don't have the slightest clue about chess, why would you make such assumptions?
Someone check their shoes!
Scottrf wrote:
VeeDeeVee wrote:
Because they only play moves calculated by the computer. The only thing they have to do, is to remember the chess-computer's move. Well both players have extremely good memory, so it is understanable that every game ends in a standard draw.
Seriously dude, if you don't have the slightest clue about chess, why would you make such assumptions?
Did Bobby Fischer have the slightest clue about chess?
The whole chess world is talking about the legedary words of Bobby Fischer few years before he died: "These days chess have nothing to do with creativity anymore. It is all about pre-arrangement and memorisation".
Can you please explain how someone memorises 64 moves deep with all the possible variations?
richie_and_oprah wrote:
ThrillerFan wrote:
bloons wrote:
oh... so how 12 draws?
The OP is making a rash assumption that all 12 games will end up a draw.
The last World Championship started this way. There were 10 draws in 12 games with the 2 decisive results occurring back-to-back.
I predict one of them will win a single game with White, and will win the match that way. I predict no tie-break this time!
i believe the last wc match was topalov-anand and it started with each side winning a game and three decisive games out of the first four
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?tid=70979
Last one was Anand-Gelfand.
We dont have to watch anymore. Before the game starts, everyone knows it will end in a draw again. Another 40 pre-arranged moves without any creativity.
FIDE has to do something as soon as possible. This is absolutely killing for chess.