If all the atoms combined that create the pieces, or indeed the technological circuits that power your device giving it the power to connect to the local router and in turn the chess servers, and the board, with it's respective computer parts, combine all these and you have the amazing game of chess. And that is why... WAIT, HE JUST BLUNDERED HIS QUEEN! ITS A MATE IN ONE FOR BLACK! IF HE FINDS THIS, (whoever) COULD WIN THE (whichever) TOURNAMENT!!
Any intelligent life here to talk about chess? Especially Mathematicians and Physicists
Sort:
Jun 23, 2023
0
#3
How would you find a method to play perfectly with King, bishop and knight against King, in any position?
Jun 23, 2023
0
#4
without the help of a table of endgames, and that is demonstrable and verifiable
Jun 23, 2023
0
#5
I discovered a method to perfectly play King and Queen against King , I also showed that Stockfish does not play chess perfectly
Jugar ajedrez sin conocimientos matemáticos limita del pensamiento de jugadas combinables y sin contar la cantidad mínima de jugadas que alcance a visualizar, por eso lo programadores y matemáticos es su gran mayoría son bueno jugando al ajedrez por su capacidad de previsualizar jugadas basadas en lógica matemática
Cómo demuestras que Stockfish no juega perfectamente al ajedrez?
Jun 23, 2023
0
#9
At the beginning of the game, no one knows how it will end if both play perfectly, 1. if white always wins, 2. either black always wins, or 3. it would be a draw, 1 of these scenarios is true in a perfect game , but not all 3 at the same time,
So, in the 24th TCEC tournament the superfinal was Stockfish vs LcZero, at 100 games taking turns 50 as white and 50 as black, the results for Stockfish were
+ 20 = 64 - 16, which means 20 wins, 64 draws, and 16 losses,
1. if he played perfectly he would have at least 50 wins as white in the first scenario, which white always wins, ruled out.
2. if he played perfectly he would have 50 wins as black, discarded,
3. I would never lose in the third scenario, in which if both played perfectly it would be a draw, discarded,
Stockfish Doesn't Play Perfectly, Proven
Chess ♟️
Jun 23, 2023
0
#11
valeria_suarez_10 wrote:
At the beginning of the game, no one knows how it will end if both play perfectly, 1. if white always wins, 2. either black always wins, or 3. it would be a draw, 1 of these scenarios is true in a perfect game , but not all 3 at the same time,
So, in the 24th TCEC tournament the superfinal was Stockfish vs LcZero, at 100 games taking turns 50 as white and 50 as black, the results for Stockfish were
+ 20 = 64 - 16, which means 20 wins, 64 draws, and 16 losses,
1. if he played perfectly he would have at least 50 wins as white in the first scenario, which white always wins, ruled out.
2. if he played perfectly he would have 50 wins as black, discarded,
3. I would never lose in the third scenario, in which if both played perfectly it would be a draw, discarded,
Stockfish Doesn't Play Perfectly, Proven
Of course stockfish doesn't play perfectly....chess isn't solved yet.
Jun 23, 2023
0
#12
valeria_suarez_10 wrote:
How would you find a method to play perfectly with King, bishop and knight against King, in any position?
Wait...are you a 900 in rapid yet can play B+N mate?
I'm over 1700 in rapid and idk how haha....nice
Jun 23, 2023
0
#13
refuting variants, and arriving at solution variants, if there is more than 1 solution, using axioms, and creating theorems
Jun 23, 2023
0
#15
In this position, do not expect a mate neither in 1 nor in 2, 3, nor in 4 because the king is very far from any edge, that is an axiom,
Jun 23, 2023
0
#17
I'm trying to figure out provable axioms and theorems to play perfectly king, bishop, knight against king, and not based on unprovable conjectures,
Jun 23, 2023
0
#18
lichess has a course that teaches how to mate with king, bishop, knight, against king, but she doesn't play perfectly,
Jun 23, 2023
0
#19
The idea is to talk about chess but in a scientific way, and not in a sports way or chess commentators