Re blindfold chess: I read that most everyone (1500 fide or so) can play a game blind, but some stronger players claim to be unable to. A good game blind? I lose several hundred points in strength it seems.
What determines a "good game?"
Re blindfold chess: I read that most everyone (1500 fide or so) can play a game blind, but some stronger players claim to be unable to. A good game blind? I lose several hundred points in strength it seems.
What determines a "good game?"
"are all..."? I would probably say no. I believe Botvinnik (world champion at one point...he's pretty good) was was not partial to speed chess, and its not surprising to see a strong player lose a speed game for being too slow.
Does strong play "require" good memory? In my opinion, no, so I don't think strong play affects blindfold and speed chess. Its works the same as with normal chess I believe: hard-work work and talent are what affect it.
Dmytro wrote: Yes, they are. Only Botvinnik didn't like blitz, he said "it is not serious". Somebody thinks that he said so because he was not good in quick chess.
Indirect shot at me huh? Classic. I like how the only basis for your answer was pointing out an inaccuracy in my post. Fine, sure-what I said did seem like it was putting down Botvinnik as a speed chess player, and did not help my case, but lemme ask you this: if two strong players of equal strength were to play a blitz game and only one was a seasoned blitz player, who would you bet your money on?
You can't automatically assume someone is good blindfold chess or blitz chess just because they're good at the normal game; Other factors will come into play. They're very few "absolutes" and I find it hard to believe this is one of them.
However, I will say this: There is a "good" chance that a strong player plays strong blitz/blindfold chess because the game is pretty much the same, with just an additional factor included.
<Dmytro>, If only by mere coincidence that your post indirectly attacked me, then I apologize, and please just take this post as merely more argument for what I believe the answer is.
in terms of blitz, yes, virtually without exception; it's the same game, with the practical difference that tactical ability is even more important. since tactical skill is the single principal difference between strong players and weaker ones, that's no real surprise. there are bullet-chess specialists who rely on the clock & reflexes & aren't very strong at slower time limits, but the reverse is almost never true. a truly strong player will be strong at virtually any time control.
I think 1500 fide is a bit low for decent blindfold play, though I suppose it can be done. I am (or was) 1900 fide, & at best I could get through a single game blindfold.
I would consider myself fairly good at chess, but I've been trying bullet, blitz and rapid chess on a 7 day trial of ICC (I'm broke right now) and my record isn't very amazing (I do alright at 15 minute rapid, 5 minutes I tend to make stupid pice-losing blunders, and bullet [1 min] is impossible). Also, I've played a few games of blindfold chess and I'm not very good at it either, so my question is: are all good chess players good at speed and blindfold chess?
This being said, I may just need more practice, but...