Study them.
Bad Endgame
Sort:
Wait, how do you lose? Do you mean you're a pawn up and draw? How do you lose when you're a pawn up? If you really did mean lose then that's a serious problem...
yashawasthi123 wrote:
What to do I am bad at endgame but can play opening well...
I always have an advantage of pawn at the endgame yet I loose.
1. No you dont play openings well. Follow opening principles (is there an echo in here?)
2. You as with all beginners are missing simple tactics.
3. You hang pieces.
4. You abandon games.
Follow Opening Principles.
Double check your moves.
Do tactics trainer.
Do chess mentor.
Diakonia wrote:
yashawasthi123 wrote:
What to do I am bad at endgame but can play opening well...
I always have an advantage of pawn at the endgame yet I loose.
1. No you dont play openings well. Follow opening principles (is there an echo in here?)
2. You as with all beginners are missing simple tactics.
3. You hang pieces.
4. You abandon games.
Follow Opening Principles.
Double check your moves.
Do tactics trainer.
Do chess mentor.
why do you bother? if he really wanted to get better he would do his own research.... and btw chess.com is not the best site for chess study, lichess is.
andyquibler wrote:
why do you bother? if he really wanted to get better he would do his own research.... and btw chess.com is not the best site for chess study, lichess is.
Or is it chesstempo? edit edit edit... Anyway, who mentioned websites? Nobody. Thread closed. None of that...
andyquibler wrote:
Diakonia wrote:
yashawasthi123 wrote:
What to do I am bad at endgame but can play opening well...
I always have an advantage of pawn at the endgame yet I loose.
1. No you dont play openings well. Follow opening principles (is there an echo in here?)
2. You as with all beginners are missing simple tactics.
3. You hang pieces.
4. You abandon games.
Follow Opening Principles.
Double check your moves.
Do tactics trainer.
Do chess mentor.
why do you bother? if he really wanted to get better he would do his own research.... and btw chess.com is not the best site for chess study, lichess is.
I simply answered the OPs question, and what he does with the answer is up to him. You shouldnt bring up other chess sites, its not looked on favorably. And besides all of that. chess.com is an excellent site.
chess.com is good for playing strong players for free. However all i'm saying is chess.com is not the best site for studying chess, only playing on it.
Also why can't I mention other websites? I happen to use as many sites that are usefull to me if I mention one why is that a big deal.
andyquibler wrote:
chess.com is good for playing strong players for free. However all i'm saying is chess.com is not the best site for studying chess, only playing on it.
Also why can't I mention other websites? I happen to use as many sites that are usefull to me if I mention one why is that a big deal.
So no comment about how you edited your post, which originally said that chesstempo was the best site for study? Of course the guys at chess.com don't want you to be saying things like this. It's bad for business. Use your head.
0
#11
andyquibler wrote:
Also why can't I mention other websites? I happen to use as many sites that are usefull to me if I mention one why is that a big deal.
It's only a big deal for the mods. They prefer that the forums not be used for advertising for the competition.
I'm not bwing paid by any sites to say this i'm just being objective xD
and also I did say chesstempo which was a brian fart, although they do have the best site for puzzles.
yashawasthi123 wrote:
What to do I am bad at endgame but can play opening well...
I always have an advantage of pawn at the endgame yet I loose.
The best thing to do is analyse your games deeply.....it works belive me.....
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
What to do I am bad at endgame but can play opening well...
I always have an advantage of pawn at the endgame yet I loose.