Accused of Cheating for Speed

Sort:
Avatar of devilssanctuary
Don't know if this type of posts (venting? introspection?) goes here, but yesterday I was in a spree of rapid games, when I encountered this opponent, who, after the beginning back-and-forth as shown here, immediately resigned upon getting that check, leaving 1 message in the chat: "stock." As an amateur who mainly plays through the mobile app for relaxation and does not interact with the chess community much, it took me a Google search to know that they were referring to the program Stockfish. Needless to say, I was a bit vexed.
 
I think it's fair to say that this sequence of moves is nothing too out of the ordinary for a human being to be able to make, that it had to have been done with a machine. Then I realized that it could've just been the speed at which I was making the moves.... If anyone looks through my game history, it'll become clear that I pretty much just grew accustomed to this playing speed through lots and lots of daily blitz games—which most people would agree doesn't really foster improvement in the game overall. And many of them end in my resignation; I have a... weird personal habit of opening the app to play blitz games during moments of the day where I want to distract myself/calm down, only to resign when I feel I can't concentrate after all & don't want to waste people's time, lol.
 
In any case, even without all that miscellaneous knowledge about my personal playing history, shouldn't it be common sense that players who have enough experience (quantity-wise) playing the game would be able to make rudimentary moves at a relatively quick pace? A major aspect of chess is pattern recognition; if a player has encountered certain sequences enough times, then it makes sense that they would be able to react quickly. With that specific game, I had actually just had games with similar openings right before.
 
As someone who's never cheated, I guess I'm just a bit disheartened to know that an opponent would genuinely suspect me of cheating due to something like this. It makes me wonder if many of the cheating complaints on this platform are like this, too...?
Avatar of SmartRollingKick

I think they said that because of your rating. The same thing happened to me, I was playing like a gm then this person said that I was using stockfish even though I don't know how to use stockfish and I never cheat I try my best to win. The person that I was matching has more rating than me so I think that's why he accused that I was cheating. So you have nothing to worry about. You can block them or report them for false report.

Avatar of devilssanctuary
ansarhajiyev wrote:

I think they said that because of your rating. The same thing happened to me, I was playing like a gm then this person said that I was using stockfish even though I don't know how to use stockfish and I never cheat I try my best to win. The person that I was matching has more rating than me so I think that's why he accused that I was cheating. So you have nothing to worry about. You can block them or report them for false report.

That makes sense, though this specific opponent had around the same rating as me. That reminds me, I've honestly always wondered about the point of the individual ratings that you get in game analyses, when I could get a 1600 for one game and then 200 for the next, lol, all depending on how focused/less blunder-prone I was compared to the opponent.

Avatar of SmartRollingKick
devilssanctuary wrote:
ansarhajiyev wrote:

I think they said that because of your rating. The same thing happened to me, I was playing like a gm then this person said that I was using stockfish even though I don't know how to use stockfish and I never cheat I try my best to win. The person that I was matching has more rating than me so I think that's why he accused that I was cheating. So you have nothing to worry about. You can block them or report them for false report.

That makes sense, though this specific opponent had around the same rating as me. That reminds me, I've honestly always wondered about the point of the individual ratings that you get in game analyses, when oftentimes I'd get a 1600 for one game and then 200 for the next, lol, all depending on how focused I was & less blunder-prone compared to the opponent.

lol, one time I won a game and got a worse analysis than the oppenent that I was matching and the oppenent blocked me for some reasons, then he reported me, luckily he was the only one to get banned. And this game that my rating was really low like 500, I was matching someone rated 1200 and I won, I also got less blunders. He thought I was cheating but he didn't report me, he was surprised so it does really get confusing to the opponent that your playing because they might think that your cheating. In the reality you don't cheat