a

Sort:
ThatGuyNamedJeff

Oh XD You made a forum saying I will give you advice, I was originally doing really badly at 812, you told me to focus more on rapid and play less bullet and so now look where I am : D 

ThatGuyNamedJeff

Thanks man! You really helped me, I just subbed to your yt as well happy.png

ThatGuyNamedJeff

happy.png

kartikeya_tiwari
pawnstar1957 wrote:
iamdecentking wrote:
IM NOT BRAGGING IM JUST DOING FOR A INTERESTING TALK

you are completely missing the point. posts like this--about beating someone who was higher rated--are not at all interesting. there are literally dozens of similar posts every day. what makes you think yours is more 'interesting' than anyone else's? it is obviously interesting to YOU and maybe to a few of your friends. but the broader chess  community simply doesnt care when a 1200 player beats a 1500 player. do you seriously not get this?

why are u being mean? people are allowed to show their best wins, no need to get upset about it

x-0460907528
kartikeya_tiwari wrote:
pawnstar1957 wrote:
iamdecentking wrote:
IM NOT BRAGGING IM JUST DOING FOR A INTERESTING TALK

you are completely missing the point. posts like this--about beating someone who was higher rated--are not at all interesting. there are literally dozens of similar posts every day. what makes you think yours is more 'interesting' than anyone else's? it is obviously interesting to YOU and maybe to a few of your friends. but the broader chess  community simply doesnt care when a 1200 player beats a 1500 player. do you seriously not get this?

why are u being mean? people are allowed to show their best wins, no need to get upset about it

i would be happy to explain it to you if you like. but if you are just here to register your opinion, that is fine too. its up to you.

Chuck639
pawnstar1957 wrote:

oh chuckie....where are you??????

I share empathy with the OP and congrats. This is a chess community and it’s fun to celebrate a win. We’ve all be there before.

As for Pawnstar, I am exercising sympathy with you. Check yourself before you wreck yourself.

Anonymous_Dragon

Folks u are missing the point. When u look up archives after the game is completed , it shows u the final rating of the opponent after the game. So perhaps he might have beaten a 1500 who's rating dropped to 1300 after losing to this guy

Anonymous_Dragon

Anyways I believe all 1500+ player gang must boycott that guy who lost to this boy . He has let the community down

asdfghkl123456798
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

Folks u are missing the point. When u look up archives after the game is completed , it shows u the final rating of the opponent after the game. So perhaps he might have beaten a 1500 who's rating dropped to 1300 after losing to this guy

no only in the past few days did his opponent go from 1400 to 1500

Anonymous_Dragon
asdfghkl123456798 wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

Folks u are missing the point. When u look up archives after the game is completed , it shows u the final rating of the opponent after the game. So perhaps he might have beaten a 1500 who's rating dropped to 1300 after losing to this guy

no only in the past few days did his opponent go from 1400 to 1500

Oh okay 👍

asdfghkl123456798

the game was a 1119 vs a 1382

Anonymous_Dragon
asdfghkl123456798 wrote:

the game was a 1119 vs a 1382

👍

Chuck639
asdfghkl123456798 wrote:

the game was a 1119 vs a 1382

263 is a big strength difference regardless. It’s basically an intermediate player vs advanced player. I’m pleased to beat anybody +25 points above. I cannot imagine the thrill of beating 200+ points.

ChernobylClocks

Nice win!

asdfghkl123456798
Chuck639 wrote:
asdfghkl123456798 wrote:

the game was a 1119 vs a 1382

263 is a big strength difference regardless.

yeah only 3 rating points below 1500-1234=266

tacticspotter
asdfghkl123456798 写道:
Chuck639 wrote:
asdfghkl123456798 wrote:

the game was a 1119 vs a 1382

263 is a big strength difference regardless.

yeah only 3 rating points below 1500-1234=266

That is actually really different

 

x-0460907528
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

Folks u are missing the point. When u look up archives after the game is completed , it shows u the final rating of the opponent after the game. So perhaps he might have beaten a 1500 who's rating dropped to 1300 after losing to this guy

the guy is not going to drop 200 points in a game unless he has played only one or two games in total. and if you bother reading the threads, he climbed to 1500 well after this loss and was in the 1300s when the game took place.

x-0460907528
Chuck639 wrote:
asdfghkl123456798 wrote:

the game was a 1119 vs a 1382

263 is a big strength difference regardless. It’s basically an intermediate player vs advanced player. I’m pleased to beat anybody +25 points above. I cannot imagine the thrill of beating 200+ points.

hey chuckie. welcome back. yesterday you posted that i was a liar for all the world to see and i challenged you to tell me what i ever lied about. you ran off like a little girl. so now im back. why are you calling me a liar?

x-0460907528

c'mon chuckie. man up.

tacticspotter
pawnstar1957 写道:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

Folks u are missing the point. When u look up archives after the game is completed , it shows u the final rating of the opponent after the game. So perhaps he might have beaten a 1500 who's rating dropped to 1300 after losing to this guy

the guy is not going to drop 200 points in a game unless he has played only one or two games in total. and if you bother reading the threads, he climbed to 1500 well after this loss and was in the 1300s when the game took place.

That... Was the joke....