Best aggresive games to study

Sort:
Avatar of Thomas9400

Looking for games of aggresive players(mikhail tal,fischer kind of,etc) ABSOLUTELY NO MORPHY!

Avatar of Arawn_of_Annuvin

Here's a devastating attack by Karpov (12.Nd4... awesome):



Avatar of Thomas9400

wow arawn that was a great game i shall analyze it later thank you!

Avatar of Thomas9400
Morphysrevenges wrote:

what's the matter with Morphy?

 

Okay then study Rashid Nezhmedtinov.

Here is a game where he managed to defeat the Tal the Magician. 

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1102235

Ive always had an annoyance with the fact that morphy played like a 1600-1800 player but people acted like hes the best. any ways thanks for the suggestion ill check it out later

Avatar of ChessPatzer987
 
Avatar of Charetter115

The Life and Games of Mikhail Tal and My 60 Memorable Games are both good books by attacking players.

Avatar of pfren

RJF was admiring two players: Morphy, and Tal.

Avatar of Thomas9400

 

That Tal vs  Sviridov game is beautifull

Avatar of Pai_Mei

Study Tal for attacks. Also, you can learn a lot about attacking by playing an opening like the sicilian dragon. It's not the best choice for black objectively, and certainly not something to play exclusively. So you'd need time to study a broad repertoire, but the dragon will teach you a lot about nuances to look for when attacking (and defending!) the castled king.

Avatar of ChessPatzer987
Avatar of Diakonia
Thomas9400 wrote:
Morphysrevenges wrote:

what's the matter with Morphy?

 

Okay then study Rashid Nezhmedtinov.

Here is a game where he managed to defeat the Tal the Magician. 

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1102235

Ive always had an annoyance with the fact that morphy played like a 1600-1800 player but people acted like hes the best. any ways thanks for the suggestion ill check it out later

So you think you can learn NOTHING from Morphys games?

Your rating here is under 1200, and yet you cant learn anything from a 1600-1800 player?

Avatar of hpmobil

Finally there's a discussion about the strength of P.Morphy in this forum. Something everybody missed. To the topic: Any well commented game collection with a handfull of games before 1900 teaches at your level what you need most. Don't spoil your time. Take a good one and go through it. Capablanca, A Primer of Checkmate or so should be perfect for you and has good recommendations for further training.

Avatar of Thomas9400
Diakonia wrote:
Thomas9400 wrote:
Morphysrevenges wrote:

what's the matter with Morphy?

 

Okay then study Rashid Nezhmedtinov.

Here is a game where he managed to defeat the Tal the Magician. 

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1102235

Ive always had an annoyance with the fact that morphy played like a 1600-1800 player but people acted like hes the best. any ways thanks for the suggestion ill check it out later

So you think you can learn NOTHING from Morphys games?

Your rating here is under 1200, and yet you cant learn anything from a 1600-1800 player?

My apoligies that is not what i meant, i belive i can learn from 1600-1800 players but not as much as from players such as tal etc

Avatar of Diakonia
Thomas9400 wrote:
Diakonia wrote:
Thomas9400 wrote:
Morphysrevenges wrote:

what's the matter with Morphy?

 

Okay then study Rashid Nezhmedtinov.

Here is a game where he managed to defeat the Tal the Magician. 

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1102235

Ive always had an annoyance with the fact that morphy played like a 1600-1800 player but people acted like hes the best. any ways thanks for the suggestion ill check it out later

So you think you can learn NOTHING from Morphys games?

Your rating here is under 1200, and yet you cant learn anything from a 1600-1800 player?

My apoligies that is not what i meant, i belive i can learn from 1600-1800 players but not as much as from players such as tal etc

If you dont think you can learn from Morphys games, i dont even know what to say.  But i wish you luck

Avatar of Thomas9400
Diakonia wrote:
Thomas9400 wrote:
Diakonia wrote:
Thomas9400 wrote:
Morphysrevenges wrote:

what's the matter with Morphy?

 

Okay then study Rashid Nezhmedtinov.

Here is a game where he managed to defeat the Tal the Magician. 

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1102235

Ive always had an annoyance with the fact that morphy played like a 1600-1800 player but people acted like hes the best. any ways thanks for the suggestion ill check it out later

So you think you can learn NOTHING from Morphys games?

Your rating here is under 1200, and yet you cant learn anything from a 1600-1800 player?

My apoligies that is not what i meant, i belive i can learn from 1600-1800 players but not as much as from players such as tal etc

If you dont think you can learn from Morphys games, i dont even know what to say.  But i wish you luck

Im guesing that is sacrcasm and you acually wish me what many would refer to as "bad luck" but in case it is not thank you

Avatar of Diakonia
Thomas9400 wrote:
Diakonia wrote:
Thomas9400 wrote:
Diakonia wrote:
Thomas9400 wrote:
Morphysrevenges wrote:

what's the matter with Morphy?

 

Okay then study Rashid Nezhmedtinov.

Here is a game where he managed to defeat the Tal the Magician. 

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1102235

Ive always had an annoyance with the fact that morphy played like a 1600-1800 player but people acted like hes the best. any ways thanks for the suggestion ill check it out later

So you think you can learn NOTHING from Morphys games?

Your rating here is under 1200, and yet you cant learn anything from a 1600-1800 player?

My apoligies that is not what i meant, i belive i can learn from 1600-1800 players but not as much as from players such as tal etc

If you dont think you can learn from Morphys games, i dont even know what to say.  But i wish you luck

Im guesing that is sacrcasm and you acually wish me what many would refer to as "bad luck" but in case it is not thank you

My wishing you luck was genuine.  I am curious who put the thought in your head that Morphy isnt worth studying?  That is such a rediculous notion.

Avatar of Ben_Dubuque

I'm still studying Morphy. He was able to simplify chess into art and yet still be accurate. Whether for entertainment or study, his games are always worth the time.

Avatar of Ziryab
Thomas9400 wrote:

Looking for games of aggresive players(mikhail tal,fischer kind of,etc) ABSOLUTELY NO MORPHY!

With all due respect, at your level, the games of Morphy might be too advanced until you have worked through Gioachino Greco's oeuvre.

Avatar of Thomas9400

Hey guys id rather not turn this into a rant about morphy becuse I am sure Diakonia and them are much more intelligent and qualified to talk about that subject. Let us continue with our aggresive game postings

Avatar of Diakonia
Thomas9400 wrote:

Hey guys id rather not turn this into a rant about morphy becuse I am sure Diakonia and them are much more intelligent and qualified to talk about that subject. Let us continue with our aggresive game postings

We are here to help.  But first things first my friend.  You will grow as a chess player much quicker, and your understanding will be much greater when you start to learn, and understand Morphys games need to be studied.  Sticking with this obsurd idea that he is a 1600-1800 player (Honestly...who told you this???) will only slow your growth.