Bot elo levels vs human elo levels (using best elo and ignore Mittens' elo)

Sort:
al3x_alexr

I would like to discuss human elo ratings vs bot elo ratings. For example, my elo in online rated games is under 1200 but the highest (in terms of elo) I've won is against wizard from clash of clans (1900) elo. However, I am unable to beat Wally (1800) elo. Note that I've beaten wizard before I've beaten Isabel (1600) elo. Just a side question, do the limited time mode bots pose less or more challenge than the standard bots (assuming the bots are of the same elo)?

So, here's the question:

How far apart should your bot elo level (the maximum bot level you can beat) be from your human elo rating (your best one) typically if you are an active user on chess.com?

Fetoxo
I am 900, and I beat all of the 1700 elo bots. And yes, this is very hard to beat wally. I can't beat him.
al3x_alexr
Fetorenczi wrote:
I am 900, and I beat all of the 1700 elo bots. And yes, this is very hard to beat wally. I can't beat him.

That's pretty good then. The highest bot level I beat at 900 was 1400 elo. I don't remember the bot name but I think it was a limited time bot.