so if someone with a photographic memory (sort of thing) just memorized tons of games and positions, would it be considered that they are 'playing' chess or not? what if they did make moves outside of the games the memorized, but it was always based on the outcomes of those memorized games/positions?
It isn't humanly possible to memorize enough games to compare to the way computers play. Bottom line is still simply that we play in a very different way.
BTW in the starting position, queens still go on their color
but it was always based on the outcomes of those memorized games/positions?
How do you think GM's play blitz so awesomely good? Does their brain process information a milion times faster than a normal human's?